Sidebar Sidebar
  • You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.

vhf/uhf base suggestions

Perhaps it is more then $100 ..
The antenna is the Last place you should skimp on.
Your antenna is likely the Most important part of your system.

I had used the Comet GP-9 for many years it it was an Excellent antenna (if not to add 1.2 Ghz in a vertical i likely would still be using it )

However..the shorter GP-3 (and the diamond version is only so so)
 
KingCobra_CDX882 said:
...
The antenna is the Last place you should skimp on.
Your antenna is likely the Most important part of your system.
Click to expand...
Yes 100% correct.

When I did some simplex tests between a diamond cr320a triband on 2m ( antenna is 1/4 on 2m) vs. A diamond nr22l.

The NR22l out performed the cr320a antenna by a 4 s units(?) as for audio what a huge difference...

I am going to purchase the comet cx-333 its cheapest without compromising quility and or gain.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
WA8ZYT said:
The NR22l out performed the cr320a antenna by a 4 s units(?) as for audio what a huge difference...

Okaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyy................
Click to expand...

Ok u caught me. More like 2 s units simplex

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:
Captain Kilowatt said:
I don't think he was talking about the increase in signal strength. If the antenna made a difference in the audio then you would make a great Jo Gunn customer. :laugh:
Click to expand...

Haha omg... I was talking about quiting less static in the voice part of the transmission

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
Vanilla Sky said:
Haha omg... I was talking about quiting less static in the voice part of the transmission

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...


OK that I will grant you but that is the increase in signal making that happen,less noise. Nothing really changes with the audio itself. I just had to say that because there are a lot of folks that think the antenna will boost their audio. After all, the great Jo Gunn antennas have both RF gain and audio gain. Hell even Radio Shack used to sell TV antennas made for the "new" color TV's when they first came out. Now I hear that there are new HD TV antennas out to get the best out of the HD signal. :laugh: I am sure someone may disagree with my statement but I shall not go back down that long and bumpy road again trying to educate the uneducatable. I have probable already said more than I should have about audio gain from an antenna. :LOL:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Captain Kilowatt said:
OK that I will grant you but that is the increase in signal making that happen,less noise. Nothing really changes with the audio itself. I just had to say that because there are a lot of folks that think the antenna will boost their audio. After all, the great Jo Gunn antennas have both RF gain and audio gain. Hell even Radio Shack used to sell TV antennas made for the "new" color TV's when they first came out. Now I hear that there are new HD TV antennas out to get the best out of the HD signal. :laugh: I am sure someone may disagree with my statement but I shall not go back down that long and bumpy road again trying to educate the uneducatable. I have probable already said more than I should have about audio gain from an antenna. :LOL:
Click to expand...

I 100% agree.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
Robb said:
Well; if the eHam reviews can be believed - the Jetstream JTB5 does not have a decent reputation - one of the worst I've read about.
Maybe 821 owns one and can say something to the contrary.
As far as the Comet CX-333; that gets one of the best antenna reviews I have read on eHam. But it isn't $100 either . . .
Click to expand...
The CX-333 is not a good choice (I have one). The 2-meter SWR curve is best at 142.5 MHz. It is relatively narrow, considering that transmitting for 2-meter FM is between 144.5 to 147.99 MHz. According to my Comet antenna analyzer it could not adequately cover the repeater sub-bands on 2 meters. I found this out because I noticed that my TS-2000 was only putting out 25 watts on one of the repeater channels, and the other hams had trouble hearing me through that repeater. The SWR at the input frequency of the repeater was 3.8:1. I'm going to try to tune the antenna, but that will probably de-tune the other bands.
 
K4BH said:
The CX-333 is not a good choice (I have one). The 2-meter SWR curve is best at 142.5 MHz. It is relatively narrow, considering that transmitting for 2-meter FM is between 144.5 to 147.99 MHz. According to my Comet antenna analyzer it could not adequately cover the repeater sub-bands on 2 meters. I found this out because I noticed that my TS-2000 was only putting out 25 watts on one of the repeater channels, and the other hams had trouble hearing me through that repeater. The SWR at the input frequency of the repeater was 3.8:1. I'm going to try to tune the antenna, but that will probably de-tune the other bands.
Click to expand...
It's unfortunate to hear your results. I also run a cx 333 mounted on a stand off at roughly 36ft. I have been satisfied with my results. 1.5 at 144mhz and 1.7 at 148mhz. 146mhz right at 1.0. On 220 I usually chat with some locals 20-30 mi out on 223.500 simplex. It's 1.0 on this freq. My mfj 259c doesn't cover uhf so I can't give exact figures. According to my swr meter it's acceptable throughout the band portion i use. Weekly I chat with some elmers on 446.000 simplex w 10 watts. They are 20-30miles out. I can only compare the 333 to a diamond x50 and x200. On 2m/70cm it seems to work as well if not better than them. I also have a buddy that runs a 333 at 20 ft and he's pleased with his results. You might have a defective 333 or possibly a problem somewhere else. Hopefully you can figure it out. 73... 20170314_072416.jpg20170314_072751.jpg
 
Last edited:

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ Wildcat27:
    Hello I have a old school 2950 receives great on all modes and transmits great on AM but no transmit on SSB. Does anyone have any idea?
  • @ BJ radionut:
  • @ ButtFuzz:
    Good evening from Sunny Salem! What’s shaking?
  • dxBot:
    63Sprint has left the room.
  • dxBot:
    kennyjames 0151 has left the room.


      Top Bottom
      Back