Greg T, first off I’m curious as to why you question the accuracy of the Daiwa 901 HP? With regards to Eham reviews it scores 4.5 out of 8 reviews and the MFJ 828B 3.3 out of 24 reviews?
Make sure you’re meter isn’t in PEP when measuring SWR.
I’ve never owned that particular MFJ product. However I have owned several other MFJ meters and the same Daiwa 901 HP you currently own. All of them needed calibrating which was either done against a Bird watt meter or a Telepost LP 700. None of them was so far out of calibration as to cause me concern. In addition they were more or less accurate based on frequency, power output and whatever scale I was using.
Personally I think any MFJ product is a crap shoot with regards to build quality, longevity or accuracy. Since you’re already at $185 to $200 for the MFJ I would suggest spending $200-$250 more for a nice second hand LP 100 or LP 100A from telepost or a used Array Solution Power Master or Power Master II. I’d even consider a used Bird 43 with a single element for your current setup and using it to measure forward or reflect power…however it won’t do both at the same time. You could add elements over time as your needs vary. These meters do show up on QTH, QRZ and Eham from time to time.
I just don’t think/believe the MFJ 828B is going to give you anything over your current Daiwa 901 HP other than digital readout and a relative frequency counter.
Do you have someone local that has a bird meter to verify/confirm the general accuracy of your Daiwa 901 HP?
PS: Say hello to my brother in LeRoy Michigan just south of Cadillac. LOL
Brad
KE0XS
South of Pittsburg