You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

That's good to know that 30'9" is what you meant. Don't worry, we all have bad days, age or not.

I seem to recall your first BW curve looked fine and you might agree the curve was bowl shaped then. If you plot your latest scan, I think you will see that the curve is like a V instead. Again, not a problem though. The MFJ resolution may present a problem for more details, so maybe that's why they have an analogue meter too. I find that scan steps of .100 khz does just fine, but my meter shows two decimal places for SWR and I have fine and coarse dials for frequency.

Very good. The bracket with the angle on your modified antenna looks like my knockoff and that was confusing me. Again your mode looks to cover all the conditions you mentioned, and the only difference I see is your radials are on the inside of the bracket with the feed point and mine are out side.
[ATTACH]2714[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]2715[/ATTACH]

<blockquote data-quote="Marconi" data-source="post: 208803" data-attributes="member: 903">That&#039;s good to know that 30&#039;9&quot; is what you meant. Don&#039;t worry, we all have bad days, age or not.&nbsp;&nbsp;I seem to recall your first BW curve looked fine and you might agree the curve was bowl shaped then. If you plot your latest scan, I think you will see that the curve is like a V instead. Again, not a problem though. The MFJ resolution may present a problem for more details, so maybe that&#039;s why they have an analogue meter too. I find that scan steps of .100 khz does just fine, but my meter shows two decimal places for SWR and I have fine and coarse dials for frequency. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Very good. The bracket with the angle on your modified antenna looks like my knockoff and that was confusing me. Again your mode looks to cover all the conditions you mentioned, and the only difference I see is your radials are on the inside of the bracket with the feed point and mine are out side.[ATTACH]2714[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]2715[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marconi, post: 208803, member: 903"] [FONT=Arial]That's good to know that 30'9" is what you meant. Don't worry, we all have bad days, age or not.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial][/FONT] [FONT=Arial]I seem to recall your first BW curve looked fine and you might agree the curve was bowl shaped then. If you plot your latest scan, I think you will see that the curve is like a V instead. Again, not a problem though. The MFJ resolution may present a problem for more details, so maybe that's why they have an analogue meter too. I find that scan steps of .100 khz does just fine, but my meter shows two decimal places for SWR and I have fine and coarse dials for frequency. [/FONT] [FONT=Arial][/FONT] [FONT=Arial][/FONT] [FONT=Arial]V[/FONT]ery good. The bracket with the angle on your modified antenna looks like my knockoff and that was confusing me. Again your mode looks to cover all the conditions you mentioned, and the only difference I see is your radials are on the inside of the bracket with the feed point and mine are out side. [ATTACH]2714.vB[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]2715.vB[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom