• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

The only part on my Sigma4 model that shows to be out of phase with the rest of the radiator...is the first 4 x 7.15" inch segments at the bottom around the area where the gamma would be.

 

For some reason however, my radials show a little more that half of the radial, from the bottom up, are in phase and the rest, up to the hoop, are out of phase and I don't understand that. 

 

Well, I took 106" for the radials and figured the radiator at 3.2 times 106": 106" x 3.2 = 339.2" x 12 = 28.2666' for the radiator being the longest radiator according to the rule. I think I actually noticed a tip-over point, where the pattern skewed badly, at a tad less than 28.26' in the model however. Real antennas are different and modeling can do everything.

 

I posted the other day that I see a similar tip-over point around .625 wl for the 5/8 wave where the current maxima changes from its low angle of about 8-9* degrees to a higher 40* degree angle with the .64 wl model. Like I told 007 however, in that case the gain in the 10* degree lobe was only a fraction behind the primary lobe, so it was still good, but diminished rapidly beyond .64.

 

If the model of the Sigma4 don't work in this regard, I wouldn't waste my time trying to model that antenna in ARRL Antenna Handbook.

 

None of my models have had any kind of verification as to accuracy.