You're correct Homer, both the 5/8 wave and the Skeleton models do indicate a phase shift on the lower end of their radiator. This happens in the Antenna View when the model has the phase feature turned on, just as we might expect we see...the familar current cross over.
I hope I'm understanding you correctly here, but there were not two Skeleton models. I did post two images of the Skeleton model however...one with Currents turned ON, and one with Currents turned OFF. I didn't do the same with the I-10K model however.
The point I was trying to make to Shockwave was that Eznec showed the I-10K, 5/8 wave model's tabular data report incorrectly for some reason by indicating there was no cross over noted in the data. However, the Antenna view showed the phase shift correctly for this 5/8 wave model as noted above.
You are also correct and a very good observation on the Skeleton model, when you note that the Antenna view shows the cross-over at segment #8, and the tabular currents data shows it at segment #10. I don't recall for sure if I added a comment to SW about that above, but what you noticed here is also unusual to me. I figure Eznec should probably nail such conditions in its results, but maybe I'm a bit too optimistic.
With Eznec, I can only suspect there is a problem I don't understand in this regard, and I can only hope it is a modeling error I made and we're not just be left with a limitation problem.
On the other hand and without intending to be critical of CST's program, I don't fully understand what I'm looking at in the image we've seen either, but to me the current at the bottom of the Vector looks much smaller than I might have been lead to believe.
The 3/4 model using An-SOF I posted the other day does look to me to suggest the same thing we see in the CST model, that there is some RF at the base of the Vector, but again I note the magnitude of the current and RF is likely very small, and what difference it makes to performance has yet to be determined.