You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

That's what I thought.
Although LC shiedaway from challenging the notions of the heavyweights who were speculating that it was some other wavelength antenna, he was, in my opinion, on firm ground with offering the direct quote from the patent that clearly stated the electrical properties of the antenna as opposed to other quotes that appeared to be stating the construction/mechanical characteristics of the antenna. Many antennas, esp mobiles, have conflicting mechanical lengths vs the electrical lengths that they operate at. . .
It appears to me that it is, according to the patent, a 1/2 wave antenna.
Hey, Doc, we are running low on nits . . . can you help

<blockquote data-quote="HomerBB" data-source="post: 365231" data-attributes="member: 8569">That&#039;s what I thought.Although LC shiedaway from challenging the notions of the heavyweights who were speculating that it was some other wavelength antenna, he was, in my opinion, on firm ground with offering the direct quote from the patent that clearly stated the electrical properties of the antenna as opposed to other quotes that appeared to be stating the construction/mechanical characteristics of the antenna. Many antennas, esp mobiles, have conflicting mechanical lengths vs the electrical lengths that they operate at. . .It appears to me that it is, according to the patent, a 1/2 wave antenna. <a href="http://www.worldwidedx.com/cb-antennas/26370-new-style-astro-plane-5.html#post86665" target="_blank">Hey, Doc, we are running low on nits . . . can you help</a>&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="HomerBB, post: 365231, member: 8569"] That's what I thought. Although LC shiedaway from challenging the notions of the heavyweights who were speculating that it was some other wavelength antenna, he was, in my opinion, on firm ground with offering the direct quote from the patent that clearly stated the [i][b]electrical[/b][/i] properties of the antenna as opposed to other quotes that appeared to be stating the [i][b]construction/mechanical[/b][/i] characteristics of the antenna. Many antennas, esp mobiles, have conflicting mechanical lengths vs the electrical lengths that they operate at. . . It appears to me that it is, according to the patent, a 1/2 wave antenna. [url=http://www.worldwidedx.com/cb-antennas/26370-new-style-astro-plane-5.html#post86665]Hey, Doc, we are running low on nits . . . can you help[/url] ;) [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom