Neither does my model apparently. I can't explain the link not working though...it works fine here. There were just 6 or 8 images of an MFG 259b readings. I see a mobile in the thread so the analyzer was likely attached to a mobile...maybe a big truck. Like I said I did not read the whole thing for context.
I just did a simple search, but I'll look for some other images. Those did tend to show closer to what Captain Kilowatts posted however.
BTW just a point, my 1/4 wave theory model is over a very good ground plane, but the model is set over Real Earth as the ground type...not Perfect just to be clear.
In light of Captain Kilowatts follow-up and sage comments, which makes total sense, I'll have to go back and check my mobile object and see why it responds like it does for me. I realize Eznec will not exactly duplicate the metal density of a real automobile frame and body, but based on what I've read from others and seen in demonstrations of modeling a mobile...my objects look to be close enough. I recently asked DB a similar question in the last post in his thread on his new Ford Explorer mobile model object.
Sorry folks, I can't explain nor support what the high impedance match I see on my mobile models.
DB and I both have discussed these objects, and I have some articles on modeling mobiles...and nary-a'-one seem to suggest the mobile will not work right. I don't have an answer, but I see the problem and I have been tussling with the Idea whether the mobile objects I use have too few or too many wires. Plus where the wires should be best located in a mobile object seems difficult to determine at this point.
Captain may have described my model well...it desperately needs a good bonding job. but I'm too old and CK is tired of the hard bonding work.
