• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

FCC hammers cell phone jammers


They need to go after cops using stingray to intercept cell data, instead.


seeing as how the FCC probably type accepted these stingray devices, they're probably not going to go after the law enforcement agencies that are buying them.
LC
 
They might as well said 100 trillion dollars. What method of collection does Charlie have over a Chinese company anyway? Can we get an update once the funds are collected and where they will be allocated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The fine will never hold up because the FCC didn't follow proper procedures. So don't expect them to collect a penny.
 
Which countries do we ship or sell to?


Most countries, currently we do not ship or sell to USA, EU including Switzerland (except in the case of permitted sales to government agencies).

Thought it was interesting. Busy working and didn't have time to research it. Our government used cell jammers at Obama's inauguration.
 
The statute that authorizes a fine for violation of the rules has 2 sections. One is those who engage in activity requiring a license or who have a license. The other is for those who don't have a license. In the former situation, the FCC can immediately fine someone for a rules violation. I guess the presumption is that if you have a license you should know the rules and you don't need a warning. In the other situation, the FCC must issue a formal citation before issuing a fine. The citation is supposed to explain the rules and why you violated them. It is also supposed to give you the right to a conference with an FCC agent to explain your situation. If you get a citation and then violate the rules a second time, the FCC is authorized to fine you.

In this case there was no citation. The FCC is taking the position that the equipment certification process is licensing and therefore they don't have to give a citation first. However, the fine is for selling the equipment and there is no FCC requirement that anyone have a license to sell equipment. This was the same argument the FCC tried to make against a dealer I represented who had a flier for an amp in his shop. The judge agreed that the FCC was wrong. But I guess they don't care what a judge says.

Care to expand on this a bit? What did the FCC do vs. what where they supposed to do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • dxBot:
    Greg T has left the room.
  • @ BJ radionut:
    EVAN/Crawdad :love: ...runna pile-up on 6m SSB(y) W4AXW in the air
    +1
  • @ Crawdad:
    One of the few times my tiny station gets heard on 6m!:D
  • @ Galanary:
    anyone out here familiar with the Icom IC-7300 mods