You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

And because of the inaccuracy of 'S' meters, on the air 'testing' will very, very seldom give you any meaningful numbers to quote. That inaccuracy also applies to the 'ear' of the one doing the reporting. That's always going to be a 'subjective' kind of thing, I know my 'ears' change from time to time, sometimes better, sometimes worse. So, on the air testing will always be a 'gross' type thingy. Either good/average/bad sort of thing. If that will satisfy your 'test', good. If not, then you have a lot of variables to get rid of, and count on it being work.
- 'Doc

Nothing wrong with this sort of testing but don't think that it's very definitive.

[QUOTE="W5LZ, post: 289607, member: 129"] And because of the inaccuracy of 'S' meters, on the air 'testing' will very, very seldom give you any meaningful numbers to quote. That inaccuracy also applies to the 'ear' of the one doing the reporting. That's always going to be a 'subjective' kind of thing, I know my 'ears' change from time to time, sometimes better, sometimes worse. So, on the air testing will always be a 'gross' type thingy. Either good/average/bad sort of thing. If that will satisfy your 'test', good. If not, then you have a lot of variables to get rid of, and count on it being work. - 'Doc Nothing wrong with this sort of testing but don't think that it's very definitive. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom