A good way of thinking about "groundplanes" is that they are the other half of the antenna. The particular 'shape' of that 'other half' of the antenna can make a difference, but that 'shape' isn't going to be too important (with in reason). That mirror bracket and all the metal connected to it makes up the 'groundplane' or the other half of the antenna. Typically, having more than needed is 'better' than not having enough. That's just one of the reasons why bonding things (body panels) is a good idea. Then, you make adjustments to the antenna to make up for having too little or too much of that 'other half'.
The word "groundplane" comes from how the first vertical antennas were made. They used the ground/dirt as their 'other half'. That dirt was in a 'plane' perpendicular to the antenna, so, the word "groundplane". All it amounts to is the 'other half' of the antenna.
Dual or phased antennas. I've tried that, if done correctly, it works, but it's just a directional antenna. If you don't have a need for a directional antenna, there's no particular benefit to them. They are not easy to set up correctly. The distance between the two antennas is important, basically determines the 'shape' of the radiation pattern, where the signal goes. The less distance between those two antennas means the less directional the whole thing gets. At the distance you have to work with, you honestly would do as good with a single antenna. I wouldn't recommend them.
Have fun.
- 'Doc