You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

My model shows very little difference when I remove the mast or isolate the mast from the antenna by a few inches. For me, this suggest there is so little current flowing in the mast that the resulting difference is very small. So, I would predict that when you add your mast you should also see very little change.

I can't be for sure, but your model looks to have a couple of data entry errors. When the segments on this segment errors report are corrected, the model should look a lot better.

The AG results should look a lot better too, if the source is connected at or near the middle of wire #8, a 2" x .50" wire with only 1 segment, and 1 (A) at 0.00* degrees of angle for the feed point.

Eznec only shows the AVG result with a FS model, and my model shows 1.024 = 0.10 db as a results. This is only a fair/good value. I believe this is why I see a 1.506 SWR, which could be better.

I forgot to post my PDF, FS model attached below

<blockquote data-quote="Marconi" data-source="post: 564750" data-attributes="member: 903">My model shows very little difference when I remove the mast or isolate the mast from the antenna by a few inches. For me, this suggest there is so little current flowing in the mast that the resulting difference is very small. So, I would predict that when you add your mast you should also see very little change.I can&#039;t be for sure, but your model looks to have a couple of data entry errors. When the segments on this segment errors report are corrected, the model should look a lot better.The AG results should look a lot better too, if the source is connected at or near the middle of wire #8, a 2&quot; x .50&quot; wire with only 1 segment, and 1 (A) at 0.00* degrees of angle for the feed point.Eznec only shows the AVG result with a FS model, and my model shows 1.024 = 0.10 db as a results. This is only a fair/good value. I believe this is why I see a 1.506 SWR, which could be better.I forgot to post my PDF, FS model attached below</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marconi, post: 564750, member: 903"] My model shows very little difference when I remove the mast or isolate the mast from the antenna by a few inches. For me, this suggest there is so little current flowing in the mast that the resulting difference is very small. So, I would predict that when you add your mast you should also see very little change. I can't be for sure, but your model looks to have a couple of data entry errors. When the segments on this segment errors report are corrected, the model should look a lot better. The AG results should look a lot better too, if the source is connected at or near the middle of wire #8, a 2" x .50" wire with only 1 segment, and 1 (A) at 0.00* degrees of angle for the feed point. Eznec only shows the AVG result with a FS model, and my model shows 1.024 = 0.10 db as a results. This is only a fair/good value. I believe this is why I see a 1.506 SWR, which could be better. I forgot to post my PDF, FS model attached below [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom