You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

To be fair they weren't all errors, some were warnings. I did fix them, but I had to modify the model to do it. It did fix AGT, that came into line, the gain and pattern didn't change much though.

Playing with the model I was able to get SWR down from 1.8 and 1.9 range to the 1.5 to 1.6 range while maintaining resonance, but pushing further only introduces more warnings. This didn't have any significant effect on gain.

Playing with your model, the differences in our modeling techniques are clear. The how of what you do and what I do are very different, yet often we get very similar results...

I think part of those differences arise from the modeling software we use, and part from different concepts of how things work. I'm also sure that EZNEC if more forgiving than 4NEC2 on some things, hence I had to modify the model you posted the dimensions to to make it work without warnings or errors...

The DB

<blockquote data-quote="The DB" data-source="post: 564836" data-attributes="member: 21346">To be fair they weren&#039;t all errors, some were warnings.&nbsp; I did fix them, but I had to modify the model to do it.&nbsp; It did fix AGT, that came into line, the gain and pattern didn&#039;t change much though.Playing with the model I was able to get SWR down from 1.8 and 1.9 range to the 1.5 to 1.6 range while maintaining resonance, but pushing further only introduces more warnings.&nbsp; This didn&#039;t have any significant effect on gain.Playing with your model, the differences in our modeling techniques are clear.&nbsp; The how of what you do and what I do are very different, yet often we get very similar results...I think part of those differences arise from the modeling software we use, and part from different concepts of how things work.&nbsp; I&#039;m also sure that EZNEC if more forgiving than 4NEC2 on some things, hence I had to modify the model you posted the dimensions to to make it work without warnings or errors...<a href="http://hittman.us" target="_blank">The DB</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="The DB, post: 564836, member: 21346"] To be fair they weren't all errors, some were warnings. I did fix them, but I had to modify the model to do it. It did fix AGT, that came into line, the gain and pattern didn't change much though. Playing with the model I was able to get SWR down from 1.8 and 1.9 range to the 1.5 to 1.6 range while maintaining resonance, but pushing further only introduces more warnings. This didn't have any significant effect on gain. Playing with your model, the differences in our modeling techniques are clear. The how of what you do and what I do are very different, yet often we get very similar results... I think part of those differences arise from the modeling software we use, and part from different concepts of how things work. I'm also sure that EZNEC if more forgiving than 4NEC2 on some things, hence I had to modify the model you posted the dimensions to to make it work without warnings or errors... [URL='http://hittman.us'][COLOR=#000000]The DB[/COLOR][/URL] [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom