You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

I suppose even if I built something, I would still have mW's of power to lower. Forgive me, when I start thinking about signals too small for my digital scope to see, I don't think clearly.

I measured the isolation in my coax switch with the connected port into a dummy load and taking the reading from the shorted port. I had 60dB attenuation there. I suppose two of those would get me close enough with a mW source that I could vary a bit, assuming the the leakage through the coax connecting them didn't find its way into the radio under test via another path...

[QUOTE="brandon7861, post: 781946, member: 53724"] I suppose even if I built something, I would still have mW's of power to lower. Forgive me, when I start thinking about signals too small for my digital scope to see, I don't think clearly. I measured the isolation in my coax switch with the connected port into a dummy load and taking the reading from the shorted port. I had 60dB attenuation there. I suppose two of those would get me close enough with a mW source that I could vary a bit, assuming the the leakage through the coax connecting them didn't find its way into the radio under test via another path... [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom