Here is an image showing the Imax circuit. The dimensional arrow represents the length of 270.5" that Tech 833 refers to as .64 wavelength in his report. This is his image and he claims the wavelength of the antenna was determined by his network analyzer---not by some formula we might use. Somebody that knows the functions of a network analyzer could address whether this is possible or not.
You guys showing the math, it looks like a 5/8 wave to me, but Bob is probably right, the small wire size used has something to do with the specific length and how it all applies to the ultimate wavelength of this antenna. So, it might be that 833's claim is also correct. I don't know for sure, but I have argued the issue with 833 and others. If 833 is right, then I ask---wouldn't the same apply to the A99?
If so, what do we say the A99 is, a 1/2 wave +?
BM, my measurements show my Imax is overall 284.5" long physically. I've heard rumors that the length was shortened some time back, so your antenna may measure different overall. If we minus out the 270.5" that 833 shows is the actual radiator, that leaves 14" and that is about the length of the bottom tuning section including the coax up to the point he shows in the image.
FYI, there is another report on the Internet that discusses why the Imax/A99 use wire instead of larger tubing. Sorry I don't recall the link. Using wire would seem to be detrimental to having a nice broad banded antenna, but we know that both the Imax and the A99 are very broad banded.
Source for some info on the A99 matcher that you might consider. This is a new version of an old report.
AA5TB - The End Fed Half Wave Antenna
Some of the big time critics of these antennas, would have us believe that the inventor of the A99/Imax was looking in his junk box one day for some wire. He found a mess that was all twisted and turned in such a way as to look like it may fit on the bottom of his new Whatchamacallit antenna. He tried it and it worked.
Others claim that Solarcon call this one the A99 because they tried to get their "A" model to work 98 times before success.
Guess what that means for poor guy working on the Imax idea. I think Shockwave was right about the Imax taking a long time to develop.