Well 'Doc you're up to your normal pessimistic approach to any efforts posted. Of course this modeling idea would have to be duplicated in the real world in order to be sure, and then different areas may still differ.
If Tech 833, was in fact using a ligament antenna test range that showed the Imax with 30* degree angles were better than the way the GPK comes at about 45* degrees, and these models support that real world finding, then where is the problem that bothers you so? At least the models supports what (another) he has tested and reported.
Earlier I posted the link to his report right here in this thread, if you want to go take look at what he said. I even told a story about how I felt originally when he posted his report. I may have even questioned him about his claim years ago. I just recently read it again, and I decided to try and see what Eznec might suggest, and I was surprised, so here we are.
Are you just a complete Oklahoma hillbilly naysayer about everything?
Most of the guys on here are just curious about stuff, some are just trying to maybe explain what happens to them, and a few try testing and reporting their ideas. We aren't trying to solve the mysteries of life or the universe.
My modeling may just be a little bit better that quoting stuff we read on the restroom walls of a Truck Stop though, so if you have anything constructive to add to my modeling work, then lets talk about the details.
