You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Greetings:

Nothing at 70 feet. The 70 i mentioned was for angle of radials from horizontal to see if the Astro plane/Top One configuration would be of use to this model. However, and now that you mentioned it if you are looking for another height to try for the sake of testing and as you would say to add (or subtract LOL) to the "trends", i would try 54 feet. My only reasoning for that height would be that it is twice the 3/4 height of the wl we are playing around with(.75x2=1.5, and 1.5x36'=54). Just some food for thought for a later project which happens to be one I am working on with a new tower-so many projects, so little time.

All that is well and thanks for the iterations. For my purposes you have helped me out quite a bit and i agree with what you say!
This surprise is welcomed by me! It may not work for all as you and everyone is well aware.

I would not expect my 70 degree theory on the radials to help out the model any, but if you want to give her a try, then that would be good...At that point we have left no stone unturned with this model at this elevation.

Thank you my friend I appreciate your work. I will try to check in periodically. Having a busy day today.

"Good Day"

<blockquote data-quote="gamegetter" data-source="post: 369664" data-attributes="member: 14621">Greetings:Nothing at 70 feet. The 70 i mentioned was for angle of radials from horizontal to see if the Astro plane/Top One configuration would be of use to this model. However, and now that you mentioned it if you are looking for another height to try for the sake of testing and as you would say to add (or subtract LOL) to the &quot;trends&quot;, i would try 54 feet.&nbsp; My only reasoning for that height would be that it is twice the 3/4 height of the wl we are playing around with(.75x2=1.5, and 1.5x36&#039;=54).&nbsp; Just some food for thought for a later project which happens to be one I am working on with a new tower-so many projects, so little time.All that is well and thanks for the iterations.&nbsp; For my purposes you have helped me out quite a bit and i agree with what you say!This surprise is welcomed by me!&nbsp; It may not work for all as you and everyone is well aware.I would not expect my 70 degree theory on the radials to help out the model any, but if you want to give her a try, then that would be good...At that point we have left no stone unturned with this model at this elevation.Thank you my friend I appreciate your work.&nbsp; I will try to check in periodically.&nbsp; Having a busy day today.&quot;Good Day&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gamegetter, post: 369664, member: 14621"] Greetings: Nothing at 70 feet. The 70 i mentioned was for angle of radials from horizontal to see if the Astro plane/Top One configuration would be of use to this model. However, and now that you mentioned it if you are looking for another height to try for the sake of testing and as you would say to add (or subtract LOL) to the "trends", i would try 54 feet. My only reasoning for that height would be that it is twice the 3/4 height of the wl we are playing around with(.75x2=1.5, and 1.5x36'=54). Just some food for thought for a later project which happens to be one I am working on with a new tower-so many projects, so little time. All that is well and thanks for the iterations. For my purposes you have helped me out quite a bit and i agree with what you say! This surprise is welcomed by me! It may not work for all as you and everyone is well aware. I would not expect my 70 degree theory on the radials to help out the model any, but if you want to give her a try, then that would be good...At that point we have left no stone unturned with this model at this elevation. Thank you my friend I appreciate your work. I will try to check in periodically. Having a busy day today. "Good Day" [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom