• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Mic Boost for Galaxy / Stryker Radios.

Shockwave

Sr. Member
Sep 19, 2009
3,992
3,622
273
Let face it, the selection of quality amplified microphones has become somewhat limited over the years. Many sound like junk and when you find one that doesn't, the switch fails and becomes "scratchy" in no time. Wouldn't it be nice to take a decent stock mic with an electret condenser type element and get quality audio with good gain and no battery to replace? Most modern radios give you this capability with a simple resistor change.

Look at what these radios use for a mic pre-amp today... Gone are the discrete transistors and in their place is a dual op-amp (NJM4558D). Boy does that ever give you some gain flexibility once you familiarize yourself with the gain controlling resistor in the negative feedback loop. For example, lets take the Galaxy DX959 and have a look at IC7. The 270k resistor (R176) is connected between the output pin 1, and the inverting input on pin 2. The more output you feed back into the inverting input, the less gain the circuit provides.

Watch what happens when you replace R176 with something larger, like a 330k resistor... Your stock mic element just reached the gain we usually see with a power mic. You may still be two steps away from perfection though. The audio quality will only be as good as the element. I've found many are using a good electret but sound a little "muddy" because they are using too high a value coupling cap and passing too much bass response in the 250 to 300 cycle range. You can't just add another cap in series at the element without blocking the needed DC. You have to get in front of the DC injection point, at a place like the mic gain control.

Because the mic will have more gain, it is also more susceptible to RFI feedback that can produce "squeals". You may find that the shielding on some stock mic cords is simply not up to the job of keeping the RF out of your AF. Replace the cord off a good old Astatic or other mic, or add some RF bypassing with a cap and choke (ferrite bead). You could do both if needed.
 
Last edited:

We got in the habit of changing R174 from 10k to 1k for drivers with wimpy straight mikes. Found that this was not so compatible with power mikes. Any boost to the radio's internal mike gain will make use of a power mike more "touchy" getting the mike's gain set so it sounds right.

73
I'm in absolute agreement here. That's why the post mentions its use is to improve a stock mics gain, to be comparable to an amplified mic. That was never a problem to me until you could no longer purchase a good mic like the 575-M6. As the selection of aftermarket mics becomes less desirable, this mod may become more desirable. Posting about the negative feedback loop used in the Icom AGC circuit tonight, made me remember and share this too.
 
It's enough to change dynamic mic to electret and add phantom voltage. Mic, capacitor and resistor. I did that with all radios I had on my bench.
No need to mess with opamp gain.
Mike
That is correct but many new radios like the Strykers are coming with a stock electret mic from the factory and still lack gain. If it had a stock dynamic element and you installed the electret, that alone adds good gain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slowmover

Bought one when at DTB awhile back.
It’s in my mix of mics to solicit on-air approval.

— Hasn’t won yet against SRA-198, RK-56, 636L.

—On Galaxy double-digit radio models behind the KL 203-P. Filters before and after amp.

— I keep mic very close. Tend to speak without much volume (baritone voice).

I’ll be interested to learn what you think.

Listening thru headphones into a digital Uniden, it’s positive attribute is it’s price.

Not sorry to own it. (4) for the price of (1) of the others mentioned means it’s an excellent backup mic where it may also be “better” than the OEM mic.

.
 
My thought is:
b42b2664a5fa311890e805e871023cad_original.jpg
 
@Shockwave & @nomadradio , thank you for starting this thread and the knowledgeable contributions. We definitely learn from what you fellas share.

After studying to well understand the schematic for the 696 board, today I'll be experimenting the above mentioned mods with different microphones. I'll report back to the rest of us who aren't techs. Interesting to see the results and being able to tailor to different mics is pretty cool.

I'm guessing once married (modded) to a mic, the mic gain will have to be adjusted to work on another depending on the differences in gains from the elements.
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.