You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

It is a very interesting antenna.
Henry's report has good points in there about the cone radiating and adding to the far field even if only slightly.
And removing the gamma match and "tapping " the 50 ohm feed point would get away from any losses caused by the gamma.
The choke and ground radials are other suggested improvements. I see that as all positive input about the antenna.

This Antenna has made me change my mind about it more than once.

It is amazing that it has generated this kind of discussion and is still ongoing.

I need to take my time to read all of the report.
Thanks Eddie.
73
Jeff

[QUOTE="AudioShockwav, post: 670459, member: 6"] It is a very interesting antenna. Henry's report has good points in there about the cone radiating and adding to the far field even if only slightly. And removing the gamma match and "tapping " the 50 ohm feed point would get away from any losses caused by the gamma. The choke and ground radials are other suggested improvements. I see that as all positive input about the antenna. This Antenna has made me change my mind about it more than once. It is amazing that it has generated this kind of discussion and is still ongoing. I need to take my time to read all of the report. Thanks Eddie. 73 Jeff [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom