You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Hey Bob, I think you missed reading the end of Cebik's article, where he also explained an exception to his claims saying Eznec is not able to effectively model a gamma match. This is in the last paragraph in this block image #5 in his 26 page article.

You missed the part about the use of MININEC being more forgiving of the limitations in Eznec?

Here is what you posted earlier.

Below we see on page #10, in the the PDF file that Cebik had more to say about the problems that Eznec has in modeling a gamma match. Here he also says in part, ".....At best the models are comparators so that we may observe some general trends as well as similarities and differences in outcomes."

The rest of the paragraph you omitted from your post #838 is in the PDF file below. The 1st part of Cebik's comments on page #10 are noted in the "png" file below.

How say you?

<blockquote data-quote="Marconi" data-source="post: 754493" data-attributes="member: 903">Hey Bob, I think you missed reading the end of Cebik&#039;s article, where he also explained an exception to his claims saying Eznec is not able to effectively model a gamma match. This is in the last paragraph in this block image #5 in his 26 page article.You missed the part about the use of MININEC being more forgiving of the limitations in Eznec?Here is what you posted earlier.Below we see on page #10, in the the PDF file that Cebik had more to say about the problems that Eznec has in modeling a gamma match. Here he also says in part, &quot;.....At best the models are comparators so that we may observe some general trends as well as similarities and differences in outcomes.&quot;The rest of the paragraph you omitted from your post #838 is in the PDF file below. The 1st part of Cebik&#039;s comments on page #10 are noted in the &quot;png&quot; file below.How say you?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marconi, post: 754493, member: 903"] Hey Bob, I think you missed reading the end of Cebik's article, where he also explained an exception to his claims saying Eznec is not able to effectively model a gamma match. This is in the last paragraph in this block image #5 in his 26 page article. You missed the part about the use of MININEC being more forgiving of the limitations in Eznec? Here is what you posted earlier. Below we see on page #10, in the the PDF file that Cebik had more to say about the problems that Eznec has in modeling a gamma match. Here he also says in part, ".....At best the models are comparators so that we may observe some general trends as well as similarities and differences in outcomes." The rest of the paragraph you omitted from your post #838 is in the PDF file below. The 1st part of Cebik's comments on page #10 are noted in the "png" file below. How say you? [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom