You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Homer will be a good source for info on what he thinks about this software. I would guess however, that he used the dimensions he generated for his Moxon at his frequency of choice. That is why I was surprised when I saw the model I made resonating down at channel 1 for CB. Homer might have a better recollection of what happened back then...if we had any further discussion about the model.

This is also not to say that I believe the models I make are absolutely Gospel and are providing perfect results. In fact I hear folks that do models and then build the physical model according to the software results...discover the resonance can be off a bit from the software results.

So, modeling may often be close, but it ain't perfect and it cannot account for obstructions, soil conditions, and terrain at your location.

I just hope Homer did not suffer the storms that went thru parts of Arkansas recently. If not, he may just be very busy this time of year.

<blockquote data-quote="Marconi" data-source="post: 476708" data-attributes="member: 903">Homer will be a good source for info on what he thinks about this software. I would guess however, that he used the dimensions he generated for his Moxon at his frequency of choice. That is why I was surprised when I saw the model I made resonating down at channel 1 for CB. Homer might have a better recollection of what happened back then...if we had any further discussion about the model.&nbsp;This is also not to say that I believe the models I make are absolutely Gospel and are providing perfect results. In fact I hear folks that do models and then build the physical model according to the software results...discover the resonance can be off a bit from the software results. &nbsp;So, modeling may often be close, but it ain&#039;t perfect and it cannot account for obstructions, soil conditions, and terrain at your location.&nbsp;I just hope Homer did not suffer the storms that went thru parts of Arkansas recently. If not, he may just be very busy this time of year.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marconi, post: 476708, member: 903"] Homer will be a good source for info on what he thinks about this software. I would guess however, that he used the dimensions he generated for his Moxon at his frequency of choice. That is why I was surprised when I saw the model I made resonating down at channel 1 for CB. Homer might have a better recollection of what happened back then...if we had any further discussion about the model. This is also not to say that I believe the models I make are absolutely Gospel and are providing perfect results. In fact I hear folks that do models and then build the physical model according to the software results...discover the resonance can be off a bit from the software results. So, modeling may often be close, but it ain't perfect and it cannot account for obstructions, soil conditions, and terrain at your location. I just hope Homer did not suffer the storms that went thru parts of Arkansas recently. If not, he may just be very busy this time of year. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom