You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

711, Homer just told me that I was wrong, and that Moxgen also produces results that are not correct. He agrees with both of you guys...the frequency ends up well below what frequency was entered into the calculator.

Because I apparently recalled Homer's Moxgen generated real world Moxon gave near perfect resonance and match, I gave up on my Moxon models a long time ago, and that was because I too found the frequency was very low compared to the frequency I entered into the Moxgen calculator. I was trying to compare my model then to Homer's real world results...and the results didn't jive.

Sorry I led you guys on a wild chase for info.

[QUOTE="Marconi, post: 480836, member: 903"] 711, Homer just told me that I was wrong, and that Moxgen also produces results that are not correct. He agrees with both of you guys...the frequency ends up well below what frequency was entered into the calculator. Because I apparently recalled Homer's Moxgen generated real world Moxon gave near perfect resonance and match, I gave up on my Moxon models a long time ago, and that was because I too found the frequency was very low compared to the frequency I entered into the Moxgen calculator. I was trying to compare my model then to Homer's real world results...and the results didn't jive. Sorry I led you guys on a wild chase for info. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom