Ameritron offers a HD version. It comes with the 572b's already installed. They beef up the pwr sply. The amp runs better with 572b's than 811's, because it runs cooler.Everybody I have talked to runs 4 of them, not 3.
Rich
perhaps they do in the "hd" version, most don't in the "standard" 811h.
i know they offered the amp with the 572's, but didn't know about the ps upgrade too. guess they had do more than just the tube change for the
$300 difference
i won't post the link, but there is an article on e-ham (do a search there) with the title: AMERITRON AL811H TUNING written by N6MW on 12 jan 2008. in the article, Tom Ranch (w8ji) makes some comments, IMO no one knows more about an 811/811h than him.
its a long read, but it is worthwhile. i won't paste the entire thing here i'll just paste some of tom's comments here: (
bold emphasis is mine)
"Let me weigh in on this since I understand the history of tube failures quite well.
The single dominant failure in the 811 tube is excessive dissipation as a function of time and dissipated power. It is NOT drive, it is virtually never a grid (I've never seen a bad grid in dozens and dozens of bad tubes I've looked at).
The typical failure by far is the anode get heated so hot it actually starts to melt a hole in the anode. At that point materials are liberated from the anode and the tube is poisoned.
Anode damage is always a function of time and anode power dissipation level. Dissipation is somewhat less than Pin/Pout, since not all of the wasted energy is in the anode. That's close enough however.
It's ALWAYS a fuction of time vs heating energy when dissipation is the failure mode. Something has to get hot enough to reach a critical temperature. It isn't drive power, it isn't output power. It's time vs heat.
Long actual transmitting times (when RF is coming out) at high dissipation kills the tubes. It's always time and heating power.
The reasons the manual advises extra heavy loading are linearity and voltage on tank components. Linearity is a non-issue on RTTY and the ALC, after an initial overshoot, has time to catch up. On CW or SSB the ALC can overshoot hundreds of times in a single QSO, and it can cause bandwidth issues as well as stress on tank components if the loading is too light for the overshoot power.
Rigs like the IC706 and FT100 have horrible overshoot. The IC775DSP is another terrible rig, as are some Kenwoods. On the other hand the FT1000D has virtually no overshoot and can be run down to a few watts with no overshoot. An IC775DSP I owned was well over 200W on peaks when I had it set at 50-60 watts carrier. I looked at a rig for Varian that was eating 3CX800A7's up (Ten Tec amp) and found the 3CX800's were being hit with 250 watts at the leading edge of every envelope rise from zero.
This is why the exciter should roughly be sized to match the amplifier, and why lowering drive power often doesn't make things cleaner. It is actually better to run nearly at full output on the radio and use an attenuator pad to reduce drive power in the PA.
Metal oxide cathode tubes are an entirely different animal. The dominant problem in them is grid dissipation and peak cathode emission.
Tube dissipation is always the biggest field problem.
If you remove the four 811's and replace then with three 572B's, there will be virtually no change in SWR or neutralization.
The available dissipation will be more than 2-1/2 times higher, and the thermal lag of a 572B is significantly longer. This results in a significant life increase if you are a bit slow on tuning or run high duty cycle modes at high power.
if you have life problems with tubes that you can't cure with a change in operating methods then the simple solution is to use 3 572's to replace the four 811's, leaving the socket nearest the fan (right rear socket) empty and removing that plate cap.
73 Tom