• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

CK and All: I had to find my reference book.

 The book is Bill Orr's 1959 edition, All about Quad Antennas.

 "At a spacing of approximately 1/8 wavelength, the parasitic element (reflector) provides an array gain of 5.7 decibels when adjusted for a maximum gain." " The gain curve is fairly constant for element spacing from 0.1 wl to 0.2 wl, with the peak of the curve falling near 0.12 wl spacing."

 Calculation: 1005/27.200 = 34.95 ft.

                     34.95 ft. x 0.12wl spacing = 4.43 ft. ( 53.16 inches)

This would yield a radiation resistance of around 65 ohms, thus with spacing near 0.15wl radiation resistances nears 72 ohms.

 

 The spacing curve for a 2 element array differs greatly, (it seems) from a multiple-element array (3 or more) where maximum gain vs, the pattern width is of greater consideration.

The best pattern width does occur at spacing greater than 0.25+wl on the array.

Looking at his figures best beam width plus best F/B ration occurs at roughly 0.50wl spacing.

Overall we are talking in micro-hairs with max gain of approximately 5.7dBd (at 0.12 spacing)

and decreasing to approximately 1 dB less nearing the 0.22 wl.

OK after all of that at 5-6:00 am in the morning and 3 cups of coffee.

I am toast, and ready for some radio fun on 6 meters scatter.o_O:rolleyes::ROFLMAO:

All the Best

Gary