For vhf uhf mobile operation, whats more desirable/efficient: NMO mount or a SO239 (UHF) mount?
Wonder if Ham City has any demo antennas they'll let you try out in the parking lot before you buy?
For vhf uhf mobile operation, whats more desirable/efficient: NMO mount or a SO239 (UHF) mount?
NMO stands for New Motorola Mount and was designed by Motorola in the late 50's, eary 60's time period for VHF and UHF mobile antennas. The mount is basically stronger, very weatherproof, lower profile, and a better impedance match at UHF. It's darned near perfect.
That's the history.
Both types of mounts have limits on how large an antenna they can handle, or how much force they can be subjected to. As long as you stay within those limits either are nice mounts. I would rather use the NMO if possible, but that's not always possible. They are a bit less obtrusive inside the vehicle. Not all manufacturers make antennas that can use an NMO mount. Oh well, so use something else.
- 'Doc