You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Unfortunately I have to many things on my plate at the moment to give what you said much thought. Perhaps you are right, perhaps not. On the plus side it is the type of thought I would rather be doing than whats on my mind at the moment. I took a break and did some research on AGT.

When it comes to the AGT, I didn't actually give the AGT results. I misunderstood where to look for said results so I looked it up in the 4NEC2 manual (first time I actually looked at the manual). When AGT is run I get results on the main screen, not the plot screen, which is where I was posting said info from. The actual AGT is 1.005, which, if what I think I'm reading is true, is within 0.02 dB of being accurate. I have a better, but not yet complete, understanding of this aspect of modeling, so for the pointing in that direction I thank you. I will, however, still be doing some more research on the topic...

The DB

Note, this was to Marconi's response to my previous post. I didn't know Shockwave or Marconi posted after that one...

<blockquote data-quote="The DB" data-source="post: 498218" data-attributes="member: 21346">Unfortunately I have to many things on my plate at the moment to give what you said much thought.&nbsp; Perhaps you are right, perhaps not.&nbsp; On the plus side it is the type of thought I would rather be doing than whats on my mind at the moment.&nbsp; I took a break and did some research on AGT.When it comes to the AGT, I didn&#039;t actually give the AGT results.&nbsp; I misunderstood where to look for said results so I looked it up in the 4NEC2 manual (first time I actually looked at the manual).&nbsp; When AGT is run I get results on the main screen, not the plot screen, which is where I was posting said info from.&nbsp; The actual AGT is 1.005, which, if what I think I&#039;m reading is true, is within 0.02 dB of being accurate.&nbsp; I have a better, but not yet complete, understanding of this aspect of modeling, so for the pointing in that direction I thank you.&nbsp; I will, however, still be doing some more research on the topic...<a href="http://hittman.us" target="_blank">The DB</a>Note, this was to Marconi&#039;s response to my previous post.&nbsp; I didn&#039;t know Shockwave or Marconi posted after that one...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The DB, post: 498218, member: 21346"] Unfortunately I have to many things on my plate at the moment to give what you said much thought. Perhaps you are right, perhaps not. On the plus side it is the type of thought I would rather be doing than whats on my mind at the moment. I took a break and did some research on AGT. When it comes to the AGT, I didn't actually give the AGT results. I misunderstood where to look for said results so I looked it up in the 4NEC2 manual (first time I actually looked at the manual). When AGT is run I get results on the main screen, not the plot screen, which is where I was posting said info from. The actual AGT is 1.005, which, if what I think I'm reading is true, is within 0.02 dB of being accurate. I have a better, but not yet complete, understanding of this aspect of modeling, so for the pointing in that direction I thank you. I will, however, still be doing some more research on the topic... [COLOR=#000000][URL='http://hittman.us']The DB[/URL][/COLOR] Note, this was to Marconi's response to my previous post. I didn't know Shockwave or Marconi posted after that one... [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom