You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

I agree Donald. At the time when I was convinced I was right in my ideas about how the cone worked, is why I contended the cone was not coaxial in the way it worked. I was saying that y'all were wrong in thinking that the cone was an extension of the coax and that is how it could radiate CMC's on the outside of the cone.

I did not know that Barkley made the statement that Bob mentions above. He asked a question about Barkely's comments, and I was reminded of my thinking and I posted my idea.

[QUOTE="Marconi, post: 498708, member: 903"] I agree Donald. At the time when I was convinced I was right in my ideas about how the cone worked, is why I contended the cone was not coaxial in the way it worked. I was saying that y'all were wrong in thinking that the cone was an extension of the coax and that is how it could radiate CMC's on the outside of the cone. I did not know that Barkley made the statement that Bob mentions above. He asked a question about Barkely's comments, and I was reminded of my thinking and I posted my idea. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom