1) Have you figured out what those LD lines represent and implemented that into your model? If not, then your model is off as the entire model has been modified because of the inclusion of that data. Therefore, if you have not implemented the loading data on every wire to your model then this whole post of yours becomes irrelevant.
2) The model that has no currents flowing in the vertical element IS NOT THIS MODEL. That, as I said at least twice above, WAS FROM A VERY EARLY MODEL, ACTUALLY THE INITIAL MODEL BEFORE I MADE MANY CHANGES. The current data you should associate with the data on page 13 is IN THE SAME POST AS THE DATA.
3) THE ONLY REASON THE MODEL ABOVE WITH ALMOST NO CURRENTS WAS MENTIONED IS BECAUSE IT WAS IN RELATION TO SOMETHING I SAW HAPPENING AND AS A DESCRIPTION FOR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY TO WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ASSOCIATE IT WITH!!!
4) Eddie, are you actually reading what I am posting?
You seem to be constantly making links between things that don't exist. Further, if you read the associated text it is clear that the links you are making do not exist. You are then being told that the link does not exist, and you continue to keep making statements where you clearly think that the link still exists. It is very frustrating having to tell you time and time and time and time again that something you are stating is wrong, and every time it being about the same thing. You get an idea and don't want to give up on it even when you are told and shown it is wrong, and there nothing to support it.
You need to keep up with what is being said or I'm done. I'm not taking the time to explain all of this just to have what I'm saying apparently be ignored. It isn't worth my time to tell you that a link you made in error is wrong multiple times, especially when reading the original messages the link you made came from clearly shows that it can not be even before you make the link.
I am as clear as I can be in how I say what I am saying, and you seem to be ignoring half of it.
Your references to the currents image above and your link to a model it has nothing to do with, and its text clearly explains not only as much but also where it is from. The explanation shows that it cannot be from the model you are trying to associate it with is a perfect example. I can go on with this example if you wish, this isn't even the half of it.
I have to ask again, are you actually reading what I am posting?
The DB
