You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Marconi, If you could learn to shut your inaccurate , opinionated mouth in the presence of people who have done the experiments on this antenna maybe folks wouldn't give up trying to teach you. It is true, if you keep denying the obvious and deny everything we can reproduce in the field, you will make those who understand, completely give up on you as a lost cause.

As DB said, he has given you all you need with the model to show the Sigma is not a 1/2 wave sold with 8 feet of mast. Most important is the fact you have also been given a specific field test right down to the 4 wires you
need to add to show you ideas are nothing more than misguided myths.

You play with your SSB signal meter with other antennas distorting your pattern while you rely on a model that is not even close to the Sigma with the determination of someone who is sure they are right. I'll stick to my Potomac field strength receiver with a single antenna under test. Knowing if you ever get someone you trust again to test your 1/2 wave on a 8 foot pole idea, you're going to be eating more words than you can imagine.

<blockquote data-quote="Shockwave" data-source="post: 499818" data-attributes="member: 10882">Marconi, If you could learn to shut your inaccurate , opinionated mouth in the presence of people who have done the experiments on this antenna maybe folks wouldn&#039;t give up trying to teach you. It is true, if you keep denying the obvious and deny everything we can reproduce in the field, you will make those who understand, completely give up on you as a lost cause.&nbsp;As DB said, he has given you all you need with the model to show the Sigma is not a 1/2 wave sold with 8 feet of mast. Most important is the fact you have also been given a specific field test right down to the 4 wires you&nbsp;need to add to show you ideas are nothing more than misguided myths.&nbsp;You play with your SSB signal meter with other antennas distorting your pattern while you rely on a model that is not even close to the Sigma with the determination of someone who is sure they are right. I&#039;ll stick to my Potomac field strength receiver with a single antenna under test. Knowing if you ever get someone you trust again to test your 1/2 wave on a 8 foot pole idea, you&#039;re going to be eating more words than you can imagine.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shockwave, post: 499818, member: 10882"] Marconi, If you could learn to shut your inaccurate , opinionated mouth in the presence of people who have done the experiments on this antenna maybe folks wouldn't give up trying to teach you. It is true, if you keep denying the obvious and deny everything we can reproduce in the field, you will make those who understand, completely give up on you as a lost cause. As DB said, he has given you all you need with the model to show the Sigma is not a 1/2 wave sold with 8 feet of mast. Most important is the fact you have also been given a specific field test right down to the 4 wires you need to add to show you ideas are nothing more than misguided myths. You play with your SSB signal meter with other antennas distorting your pattern while you rely on a model that is not even close to the Sigma with the determination of someone who is sure they are right. I'll stick to my Potomac field strength receiver with a single antenna under test. Knowing if you ever get someone you trust again to test your 1/2 wave on a 8 foot pole idea, you're going to be eating more words than you can imagine. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom