You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Think of this as reporting the news Marconi. The responsible reporter confirms information prior to posting it and avoids having to base the report on opinion. It borders insanity to continuously post an opinion that contradicts multiple sources of confirmed information and is exactly what you've been doing for years on this topic. To believe your opinion we must disregard all of my field tests and all of the field tests conducted by my clients. Clients that take their coverage and measuring the field strength much more seriously than you. You have to disregard Bob's field tests, Jazz's and Booty Monsters too. You have to disregard the CST 2db gain figure and the odd shaped 1/4 wave current on the cone you can't explain. You have to disregard the fact we have told you the pattern is formed by two currents. You have to disregard the fact that EZNEC is off by 100% in the four wire phase test. You have to disregard Cebik's analysis of the Sigma being a "non apparent collinear"... I'm sorry Marconi, to believe your opinion over all of this would be insanity on my part.

<blockquote data-quote="Shockwave" data-source="post: 500716" data-attributes="member: 10882"><p>Think of this as reporting the news Marconi. The responsible reporter confirms information prior to posting it and avoids having to base the report on opinion. It borders insanity to continuously post an opinion that contradicts multiple sources of confirmed information and is exactly what you&#039;ve been doing for years on this topic. To believe your opinion we must disregard all of my field tests and all of the field tests conducted by my clients. Clients that take their coverage and measuring the field strength much more seriously than you. You have to disregard Bob&#039;s field tests, Jazz&#039;s and Booty Monsters too. You have to disregard the CST 2db gain figure and the odd shaped 1/4 wave current on the cone you can&#039;t explain. You have to disregard the fact we have told you the pattern is formed by two currents. You have to disregard the fact that EZNEC is off by 100% in the four wire phase test. You have to disregard Cebik&#039;s analysis of the Sigma being a &quot;non apparent collinear&quot;... I&#039;m sorry Marconi, to believe your opinion over all of this would be insanity on my part.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Shockwave, post: 500716, member: 10882"] Think of this as reporting the news Marconi. The responsible reporter confirms information prior to posting it and avoids having to base the report on opinion. It borders insanity to continuously post an opinion that contradicts multiple sources of confirmed information and is exactly what you've been doing for years on this topic. To believe your opinion we must disregard all of my field tests and all of the field tests conducted by my clients. Clients that take their coverage and measuring the field strength much more seriously than you. You have to disregard Bob's field tests, Jazz's and Booty Monsters too. You have to disregard the CST 2db gain figure and the odd shaped 1/4 wave current on the cone you can't explain. You have to disregard the fact we have told you the pattern is formed by two currents. You have to disregard the fact that EZNEC is off by 100% in the four wire phase test. You have to disregard Cebik's analysis of the Sigma being a "non apparent collinear"... I'm sorry Marconi, to believe your opinion over all of this would be insanity on my part. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom