Well, to take you down a rabbit hole - but only to let you see - then you can decide to climb back out or pursue this further...
The reason I showed you what I did was to bring attention to the way the radio handles and processes the signals.
As you have been introduced to - the Galaxy Saturn is not far different from the later model cousin - pretty much the same layout and technology, except the parts that use the technology are highly advanced - by several generations.
Transistors these days are much faster and use a different die layout design to make them work - so the older days of PN then add another P to make a PNP and the same can be said for NPN - those days of the accretion/diffusion process has changes more over to a expose diffusion process and masking that although the part number is correct - the performance of that part does vary from the older days. The junction types change the behavior of the once analog device into a more linear digital switch - lower noise and better layouts give the part an edge in performance that tends to make the part overperform in the newer boards.
So, while you enjoy the "new radio smell" and the performance that it provides, the slamming of the needle is showing you a limitation in the design, but not the product.
You can't just put older parts in and expect the radio to recover - no; that won't happen - the layering and pontification of the newer parts and their performance - makes the interfacing difficult.
For Educational Purposes Only
View attachment 57835
View attachment 57836
Part of the issue is IC1 - and it's later SMD/Analog DIP cousin using the newer SMD layout inside - makes the linearity and operational character faster - and trigger happy - which is a performance improvement by the modification of the input die layout of the pins - they have less capacitive and inductive reactive component structure so that affects the way the trigger/linear operation - works in a circuit they tuned and designed to offset a now-seen-as-a-quirk reactive element from the earlier generations.
- Study the schematics of two different parts - one top from 2012 and the other from 2005 lower - the differences are not in the schematic - which tends to force the part to stay within a given Part numbering - in this case an LM324 - but the die to make it and the process used to make the die for the thing to work is advanced by several degrees.
- So this changes the PRFORMANCE the part has, so to make the part operate liek it's older cousin it is supposed to replace - requires a new level of thinking and adaptation of the older platform technology to handle the newer part at an interface level.
So, what do you do? Not much - but what is DOES show, is the way the radio switches the IF frequency - and how quicky it stabilizes.
The reason I mentioned earlier about the conversion process and showed that part of the circuit - was due to the changing or shift in IF frequency window to above and just below the CENTER IF frequency - USB/LSB and the AM - USB and LSB signals are extracted from 27MHYz (for example) and brought to a 10.7MHz (thereabouts) frequency - but you also have an AM signal that is imaged - and has a carrier component - this is important to know when trying to find out if you have a slow VCO or a bad IF filter crystal network.
A slow switching VCO blips the meter because to obtain the IF image of the SSB signals it uses a high - gain amplifier and the AGC side of IC1 - controls the LEVEL of gain.
IF the switching process, it's not supposed to be noisy, but the switch happens so quickly the IC1 sees a carrier - from its own IF - and so the USB sides conversion process - being so much closer to the CENTER of an AM carrier Image - having to start filtering out that "carrier" you see that blip.
That is the best way I can describe it.
TO fix that? tweaking - but the opinions of how to do it is comparing apples to oranges, one tech might adjust the AGC caps and actually lower one value and add in another one piggybacking the cap with a value of 1/2 the original cap used. Another would just offset the USB coil and perhaps the input level strength (signal strength) of the SSB side as tradeoffs to fix a overzealous AGC caused by the new fanged IC1 replacement and upgraded part with the same pinout and functionality - and call it LM324.
I'll let you gather your wits and see if you even want to know more...
Don't worry about the rabbits' watch - I took the batteries out a long time ago, it's been 5 o'clock somewhere, nearly forever...