You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Yes, I don't know for sure if either radio was set to "narrow" or "wide". I since reset both readios, so I'm not sure how either was set. I'm assuming they were both set at their factory default settings, whatever that is likely to be.

Even thought the HT is 1/4 the size of the mobile unit, I wouldn't expect the RX spec would be that much inferior to the mobile on a solid signal. So I must have set something wrong. That is the premise I am checking on.

On the other hand, as you suggest, this may be a consequence of an inferior front end compared to the mobile when "off frequency." And why would the net folks adverstise an "off frequency" frequency?

[QUOTE="Need2Know, post: 355089, member: 23916"] Yes, I don't know for sure if either radio was set to "narrow" or "wide". I since reset both readios, so I'm not sure how either was set. I'm assuming they were both set at their factory default settings, whatever that is likely to be. Even thought the HT is 1/4 the size of the mobile unit, I wouldn't expect the RX spec would be that much inferior to the mobile on a solid signal. So I must have set something wrong. That is the premise I am checking on. On the other hand, as you suggest, this may be a consequence of an inferior front end compared to the mobile when "off frequency." And why would the net folks adverstise an "off frequency" frequency? [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom