• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

SWR CHANGE AFTER MOVING ANTENNA

darticus

Active Member
Oct 17, 2011
104
4
28
Quick question
I moved my antenna antron 99a up. My SWR went up to the point that channel 1 is 2 to 1 and 40 is 1.4 to 1. Would you adjust the rings on the antenna which would mean me taking it down again or would you just use an antenna tunner that I already have. If you use the tunner don't you lose watts out? Ron
 

Quick question
I moved my antenna antron 99a up. My SWR went up to the point that channel 1 is 2 to 1 and 40 is 1.4 to 1. Would you adjust the rings on the antenna which would mean me taking it down again or would you just use an antenna tunner that I already have. If you use the tunner don't you lose watts out? Ron

Seems to me your bandwidth for an A99 is too narrow, but I have no clue as to why.

My A99 at about 40' to the mount shows an SWR of less than 1.20:1 from 26.505 to 27.305, and 1.10:1 resonance seems to be set a bit low in the CB band. Set a little higher in band and still at 40' high, it shows less than 1.20:1 from 26.805 to 27.605, and both ways are almost double the CB bandwidth. And BTW, at my location I am tight on space and it could be said I have a lot of stuff around and close by my antennas, and I don't think I see such affects.

What were your readings at 1 and 40, before you moved it up?

Did you have to change the feed line or add a jumper?
 
Last edited:
Why the change in SWR? Because something physical changed with the antenna, as in it's relation to the things around it, it's environment. (It can make a difference.)
Better to use a tuner at the transmitter end or use the existing "tuner" at the antenna's input? If you use a tuner at the transmitter's end of the feed line then the feed line becomes 'part' of the antenna. The mismatch is still there, but it's been transformed to something close to what the transmitter want's to see. Since the impedance mismatch is still there, there will still be the losses associated with that mismatch, you'll basically 'loose' some power. By using the existing 'tuner', the rings on that antenna, you've eliminated the feed line as a source of loss because of a mismatch in impedance. So, which would you think would be the better idea? Sure, it'll be more trouble to do, but the results will probably be more noticeable.
And just to keep things in perspective, there are losses associated with any impedance transformation. They don't necessarily amount to a lot, but they are always there. The smaller those losses the more 'acceptable' they are.
- 'Doc

(What you need is a trained antenna monkey. They'll do the climbing and adjusting, you just have to feed them...)
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • @ kopcicle:
    If you know you know. Anyone have Sam's current #? He hasn't been on since Oct 1st. Someone let him know I'm looking.
  • dxBot:
    535A has left the room.
  • @ AmericanEagle575:
    Just wanted to say Good Morning to all my Fellow WDX members out there!!!!!