You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
The Feb 2025 Radioddity Giveaway Results are In! Click Here to see who won!

Reply to thread

Message

Hi shockwave,

I understand your point of view about the first section of your replay. And agreed it is how you explain it, i would explain it otherwise but were both saying the same.

About the 3/4 wave.. oke, guess on the forum the vector 4000 is beeing discussed so ill read that first.. It would be very intresting if one could lower the radiation angles as for now, i always thougth beyond 5/8 wave there would be to much "lobs" so overall efficiency would drop, if i read you rigth you could bypass that ? In the comming couple of weeks ill look into verticals more as normally i am a bit more on active in beams..

A bit off topic, but perhaps we could discuss collinears in the near future.
As i recon a "phased" vertical between 30..40 feet could make a noticable difference ..
(building now one base is 50mm ...2,5 inch)

Do you use eznec ? i can send you a couple of files. Wich i am building.

See u all around

73. H.

<blockquote data-quote="Henry HPSD" data-source="post: 205191" data-attributes="member: 2333">Hi shockwave,I understand your point of view about the first section of your replay. And agreed it is how you explain it, i would explain it otherwise but were both saying the same.About the 3/4 wave.. oke, guess on the forum the vector 4000 is beeing discussed so ill read that first.. It would be very intresting if one could lower the radiation angles as for now, i always thougth beyond 5/8 wave there would be to much &quot;lobs&quot; so overall efficiency would drop, if i read you rigth you could bypass that ? In the comming couple of weeks ill look into verticals more as normally i am a bit more on active in beams..A bit off topic, but perhaps we could discuss collinears in the near future.As i recon a &quot;phased&quot; vertical between 30..40 feet could make a noticable difference ..(building now one base is 50mm ...2,5 inch)Do you use eznec ? i can send you a couple of files. Wich i am building.See u all around <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />73. H.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Henry HPSD, post: 205191, member: 2333"] Hi shockwave, I understand your point of view about the first section of your replay. And agreed it is how you explain it, i would explain it otherwise but were both saying the same. About the 3/4 wave.. oke, guess on the forum the vector 4000 is beeing discussed so ill read that first.. It would be very intresting if one could lower the radiation angles as for now, i always thougth beyond 5/8 wave there would be to much "lobs" so overall efficiency would drop, if i read you rigth you could bypass that ? In the comming couple of weeks ill look into verticals more as normally i am a bit more on active in beams.. A bit off topic, but perhaps we could discuss collinears in the near future. As i recon a "phased" vertical between 30..40 feet could make a noticable difference .. (building now one base is 50mm ...2,5 inch) Do you use eznec ? i can send you a couple of files. Wich i am building. See u all around :-) 73. H. [/QUOTE]

Top Bottom