What is the point of trying to compare omnidirectional CB antennas using testing that has too many variables to be meaningful? Different mounts, heights, feedlines, times of day, conditions (yes, groundwave conditions vary a great deal on 10 and 11 meters) .
RX stations with a possible agenda or incompetence, insistence on using SSB (dumb) instead of a constant carrier mode. How do you know if you take one down and put another up, a big panel truck didn't just park in front of your RX station's house, affecting the incoming signal as much as any potential difference between antennas? How do you know that there wasn't another transmitter on the air near your RX station's house, de-sensing his RX for one of your antennas, but not by the time you got the other one on the air?
Nothing wrong with playing around, as long as you know that that's ALL you are doing with such stuff. Coming here on the forum and stating as fact that one antenna has more gain than another based on this kind of flawed, uncontrolled, invalid testing means is VERY misleading and invalid.
RX stations with a possible agenda or incompetence, insistence on using SSB (dumb) instead of a constant carrier mode. How do you know if you take one down and put another up, a big panel truck didn't just park in front of your RX station's house, affecting the incoming signal as much as any potential difference between antennas? How do you know that there wasn't another transmitter on the air near your RX station's house, de-sensing his RX for one of your antennas, but not by the time you got the other one on the air?
Nothing wrong with playing around, as long as you know that that's ALL you are doing with such stuff. Coming here on the forum and stating as fact that one antenna has more gain than another based on this kind of flawed, uncontrolled, invalid testing means is VERY misleading and invalid.