You'll never get a straight answer that works for every situation. Hams that have only ran store bought amps haven't had to go through this.
Or built their own using PROPER techniques.
You'll never get a straight answer that works for every situation. Hams that have only ran store bought amps haven't had to go through this.
Or built their own using PROPER techniques.
As it was stated before in this post Lowest SWR does not mean resonance!
The only reason SWR comes into play is to protect the radio equipment.
Some antennas resonance is not 50 Ohms and is still reactive not resistive.
I had 100 ft of coax with no antenna attached give me a 1:1.0 SWR.
Side Step, slide under.. Dosey-doh...- A lot of people miss that Resonance part...
Another aspect others don't always consider in using Balun type matching - is it's multiplier effect...
Step-up ... Step-down - Step over...
In these cases - any of them with the "smashed coax" or kinked and then twisted line - usually means replacement of the WHOLE line and it's exact length. Not just a barrel connector here or there like patchwork - there is a considerable amount of loss per connection "joint"
It could happen. I've picked up some ham amp projects that were scary. Fortunately they didn't get far enough along to start a house fire or electrocute themselves. Ignorance is bliss on all the bands.
No there isn't, that's a false claim. Losses from connectors are fractions of a dB per connector. There's a Youtube video of a guy who connects I think it is 30 connectors and adapters together of all kinds, SO239, N type, BNC with the only thing they share being they're all 50 ohm impedance and measures the output from an analyser at the other end and its not even one dB lost throughout the whole chain.
Sure some are scary but the cast majority are fine. Besides the point was not about HV issues or such other safety issues but rather input tuning and the required tuned input network versus a piece of coax cut to length to effect a matching stub.
I have known many Ham Operators who built their own amps and some were mono band and some were multi band and some bothered with building a tuned input and some did not.I never heard any of them mention having an issue with the length of the jumpers or feed line.My amp has a tuned input and the antenna is also adjustable. No idea how long my coax jumpers are. Since the antenna input and amp input is very close to 50 ohms and the X is low the jumper length doesn't matter.
When I ran comp amps like everyone is building I had to trim a couple of jumpers to make everything play. It really depends on what you're working with.Some of the old sweep tube amps have crappy input tuning and jumper lengths can help.
You'll never get a straight answer that works for every situation. Hams that have only ran store bought amps haven't had to go through this.
No there isn't, that's a false claim. Losses from connectors are fractions of a dB per connector. There's a Youtube video of a guy who connects I think it is 30 connectors and adapters together of all kinds, SO239, N type, BNC with the only thing they share being they're all 50 ohm impedance and measures the output from an analyser at the other end and its not even one dB lost throughout the whole chain.
Agreed. I missed that and had to go back after you mentioned it. For some ungodly unknown reason signal calculations always seem to like to use 1 dB per connector when determining expected signal strengths when calculating system and path losses. I had to do that MANY times when I was in commercial broadcasting. I always thought it was stupid however I guess it did give an absolute worse case scenario. I myself have strung a crap load of connectors of just about every series from UHF to BNC, F, N, mini UHF, TNC etc and despite having about two dozen connectors in series I could barely notice any losses. Even when using 5 watts for full scale deflection I would still see greater than 4 our watts after all the connectors. Insertion losses are much less than 1 dB per connector. If they were very high the connectors would heat up under high power operation.
I have known many Ham Operators who built their own amps and some were mono band and some were multi band and some bothered with building a tuned input and some did not.I never heard any of them mention having an issue with the length of the jumpers or feed line.
SIX-SHOOTER
OMG!
And here I catch both of you saying this...
- Did you bother to have the Volume up enough, to hear, or at least read, the CC - it's based upon 20 Meters? Start at 3:28 ok? Use CC if you need to...
Did you not read the post about the Co-phased antennas? Semis' use these co-phased harnesses all the time...
You guys just nixed yourself and to claim yourselves as Amateur Operators!
Call signs or not, go back to your respective corners and come out swinging with real reasons as to why...
Ok, How I feel aside, you just insulted the very essence of your existence with the total disregard to the PROPER Install and use of a harness in Co-phased arrays and their own networks!
Don't flame me until you figured that one out! (You need that length - have we forgotten? How about those antennas that use a Matching Network in order to obtain low-SWR - DC-Grounded Shunt fed-antennas would never exist!)
Connectors? Why worry? Well, you don't fix the messes I see...I answered Marconi's question about the Feed line - single antenna or Co-phased with examples of why this train of thought even exists - common' guys, you know the realm of length is there, even though we presume it can be disregarded. (We forget the fine print - If Properly Installed)
The issue of Resonance and Radiators - and the Feedpoint impedance are variables that many CB'ers or Amateurs as shown above...tend to ignored because people are too focused on SWR. So those store bought antennas are designed to handle a wide variety of installations, but none, no - not one can claim better than a Dipole - especially when you know the antennas radiators are far less in length than even a 1/4 wave whip.
However, with lower SWR, these hapless users can now offset that loss, by using far more power that replaces the wattage and field strength into this Low-SWR but lossy low-radiation-resistor of a Radial - and reap the benefits that assure the rest of us the Lengths do matter - just not necessarily referring to coax.
Refer to Owners Manual.
You guys know better!