i wouldnt bumper mount it. that would lower the antenna performance
the tri mount is good and should work well
the tri mount is good and should work well
now one more thing. Would ya'll recommend running another ground to the chassis just to have a more solid ground or would the magnets be suffecient enough?
26.965 = 104.135 inches
27.205 = 103.216 inches
27.405 = 102.463 inches
I would not expect a 1:1 Swr with a 1/4. A good example is a 1/4 wave ground plane, with 4 90 degree radials i would expect to see about 30/35 ohms at the feed point, even tho the antenna is cut to the proper length.
If you pull the radials down to about a 45 degree angle, it will raise the feed point closer to 50 ohms.
Doc is correct, you do not always see a 1:1 Swr at resonance.
This would require a matching network.
For myself......I do not personally care for bumper mounts, too much reflect off of the metal of the car/truck
If you are Happy with the Tri Mag Mount on the roof I do not think you are going to gain much by hard mounting it.... unless you are running very high power levels. That is a different ball game.
Yes it will trim trees and everything else....but.
73
Jeff
26.965 = 104.135 inches
27.205 = 103.216 inches
27.405 = 102.463 inches
I would not expect a 1:1 Swr with a 1/4. A good example is a 1/4 wave ground plane, with 4 90 degree radials i would expect to see about 30/35 ohms at the feed point, even tho the antenna is cut to the proper length.
If you pull the radials down to about a 45 degree angle, it will raise the feed point closer to 50 ohms.
Doc is correct, you do not always see a 1:1 Swr at resonance.
This would require a matching network.
For myself......I do not personally care for bumper mounts, too much reflect off of the metal of the car/truck
If you are Happy with the Tri Mag Mount on the roof I do not think you are going to gain much by hard mounting it.... unless you are running very high power levels. That is a different ball game.
Yes it will trim trees and everything else....but.
73
Jeff
Booty',
What you saw with that 102" is about as normal as it gets. What you saw with the 10K is also about as normal as it gets. What's the difference? It deals with reactances in the antenna system. I won't even try to explain that, it get's to 'involved'/'deep', and I'm too lazy. It also deals with antenna 'Q'.
- 'Doc
(I won't make any comments about your Montero. )
i tried a 102 in the middle of my monteros roof and the vswr was 3.0+ . my stud mount adds about 1 1/2 inches of length to to the antenna for a total length of about 103 1/2 inches , so i was very very close to the 103.216 inches for the middle of the cb band mentioned above .
http://www.worldwidedx.com/cb-antennas/30479-10k-tunes-1-3____102-3-0-a.html
i was told i needed a spring or something to add a few inches of length to the antenna .
my mount is a firestick DM4 using lug connectors , not a 239/259 .
so whats the deal ?
is my montero unique ?
the 10k tuned fine , simply changed antennas .