i do tend to get a bit "spouty" when it comes to certain subjects, and looking back at my post; i did kinda jump all over your @#$% for what could have been construed as a funny comment.
im cool if you're cool.
back to antennas. the standard "102" whip" used to come in either a stainless steel or fiberglass version.
the fiberglass tended to be a bit stiffer and retained more of its vertical stature when driving.
the fiberglass version was simply a 14-16ga. (maybe even 18ga!) copper wire embedded in a fiberglass shell.
no coils, no helical winding, just a vertical wire.
my contention, from what little i think i understand about it, is that the fiberglass does indeed introduce a significant velocity factor, and that is why the copper wire/fiberglass "102" whip" is actually 96" long.
yes, i am kind of guessing here. the way i see it, its like making a dipole out of insulated as opposed to uninsulated wire.
the insulated wire would be shorter.
if i am off base i am certainly willing to learn, but i need to know the "why's" before i am convinced.
LC
im cool if you're cool.
back to antennas. the standard "102" whip" used to come in either a stainless steel or fiberglass version.
the fiberglass tended to be a bit stiffer and retained more of its vertical stature when driving.
the fiberglass version was simply a 14-16ga. (maybe even 18ga!) copper wire embedded in a fiberglass shell.
no coils, no helical winding, just a vertical wire.
my contention, from what little i think i understand about it, is that the fiberglass does indeed introduce a significant velocity factor, and that is why the copper wire/fiberglass "102" whip" is actually 96" long.
yes, i am kind of guessing here. the way i see it, its like making a dipole out of insulated as opposed to uninsulated wire.
the insulated wire would be shorter.
if i am off base i am certainly willing to learn, but i need to know the "why's" before i am convinced.
LC