May be your meter is not designed to register pep accurately.
LOL, okay
May be your meter is not designed to register pep accurately.
And again the pep vs "bird watts" issue arises when we all know that pep is the only true measurement of an amplitude modulated signal so all previous arguments are null and void as they pertain to this amplifiers output and it's builders claims of it's output.
If I recall he never claimed his meters readings to be either pep or "BIRD WATT".
I don't buy that. When I add compression to my signal, it sounds louder at the receiving station, my avg wattage will climb slightly while the pep wattage remains constant.
I don't buy that. When I add compression to my signal, it sounds louder at the receiving station, my avg wattage will climb slightly while the pep wattage remains constant.
I guess it doesn't have anything to do with what Mack said, my compressor is working is all. I just don't understand the hate for a Bird meter, except maybe he can't afford one.I don't understand how this pertains to what Mack said....A well set up compressor won't have any effect on peak levels. I still use a pep meter with my compressor...personally it works better than rms in this situation...I can get a better idea of where my average peak power is hanging out at.
Maybey I'm missing something.........
personally it works better than rms in this situation...I can get a better idea of where my average peak power is hanging out at.
I guess it doesn't have anything to do with what Mack said, my compressor is working is all. I just don't understand the hate for a Bird meter, except maybe he can't afford one.
But, I like to monitor my avg power, as well as my pep power sometimes depending on what I'm doing. It's all relative to your station and your tech anyway once you are up and running.
The only meter that I've found that can do consistent average power readings is a Bird. There are several meters that do pep quite well, but none who do avg very well at all, which is worth looking at.
BTW, there is absolutely no such thing as RMS power or watts. Only RMS voltage and amperage, so be sure of what you are saying before talking me down.
359 said:I don't buy that. When I add compression to my signal, it sounds louder at the receiving station, my avg wattage will climb slightly while the pep wattage remains constant.
OK, Im seeing a few "common" terms misused.
"peak" and PEP are one of the same. PEP means PEAK envelope power. This is the highest power measurement, measured at the very top point of the sine wave.
For a great read on RMS and AVG
http://www.eznec.com/Amateur/RMS_Power.pdf
pep is a pointless use of measurement ,this test is inconclusive at best and not believable as far as i am concerned i think you are right shock hes dumping an am radio into an amplifier with pep am 25000 slug readings into a dummy load rated at less than half?and we did not get to see either of the meters at modulation hog wash!Exactly! When you see the dampening effect after modulation peaks on the Bird, you know it's PEP watts. When you know linear amplifiers and see that video, you also know you have an amplifier that falls short of being able to modulate half of what's it's keying now. It would run OK at about 5 KW carrier on AM. I've seen a 3CX3000A7 do this power on PEP and a 3CX6000A7 blow the PEP board right up in the Bird.
If the goal in this video was to demonstrate he has the ability to build and test a linear amplifier, the watt meter alone is proving the amplifier is not even running close to linear. Then you have those volt and amp meters. Showing 60 volts at 20 amps for 15 KW carrier. Or was it meant to reflect 6000 volts at 2 amps? That would only mean the amp was running at about 120% efficiency....LOL.
If that is Wizards shop, he should get a scope and a Bird RF sampler for that line section and compare those small positive peaks with flat tops against the big negative peaks with RF cutoff. I also find 450 watts drive for 15 KW carrier at over 33 times power multiplication on a triode more then I'll believe. That tube runs around 12db gain and that means the drive requirements should be closer to double what is claimed.