Static build-up, lightning strikes, and angle of radiation. Those are all reason enough. But ears is another major factor.Why exactly? Other than less static noise what advantage is there to simply changing the material to aluminum? Thanks!
Static build-up, lightning strikes, and angle of radiation. Those are all reason enough. But ears is another major factor.Why exactly? Other than less static noise what advantage is there to simply changing the material to aluminum? Thanks!
I was surprised to see the Antenna (SWR) Warning Light on my 655 did not illuminate until the SWR was at 3.0. Cause of defect was a bad "crimped" PL259 on a 15" jumper. Apparently, the manufacturer thinks anything less than 3.0 is A-OK.Those SWR slaves... My dummy load have perfect SWR and so what?
Put that antron properly, and I'm not talking about it's height.
Can you imagine how many returns they'd get if they set it at 1.5? A 3.0 isn't going to hurt anything.IApparently, the manufacturer thinks anything less than 3.0 is A-OK.
That's my point. I (and many others) have always focused on, stay below 2.0 and probably for no reason. I have helped several guys "trim" mobile antennas trying to get that "magic" 1.5:1 SWR.Can you imagine how many returns they'd get if they set it at 1.5? A 3.0 isn't going to hurt anything.
I'm not really certain what you are trying to say. At least the the warning served its intended purpose.That's my point. I (and many others) have always focused on, stay below 2.0 and probably for no reason. I have helped several guys "trim" mobile antennas trying to get that "magic" 1.5:1 SWR.
Ever since I was fifteen years old, I thought a SWR above 2.0 would ruin a radio. Here I am at 74 and realizing (and being educated) I had nothing to worry about when the SWR was 2 to 3.I'm not really certain what you are trying to say. At least the the warning served its intended purpose.
Do you work in an industry (or know of an industry or situation) that expresses swr as a ratio like "3:2" or something? In CB and ham radio it is always expressed as "x.x:1" so the experienced operators here know right away that it is in fact a ratio. Seriously though, is the "1" in the ratio not always a given when expressing swr?A "ratio" generally shows how much greater than or less than one is the variable quantity. "2" or "3" by itself is not a ratio; an "SWR" of "2" is meaningless. Compare the "2" or the "3" to one, like 2:1 or 3:1.
I would hope you wrote it out in its entirety on a formal maintenance log. There is always a chance you could have to defend your log entries in court.We did radio installs for county vehicles and had to check SWR and note it on the maintenance log.
We wrote it as 1.20:1 or 1.15:1 on the paperwork.
Used a Telewave to read forward then reflected and the chart on the back of the meter to get SWR.
Spoken word, one point five to one but it's all the same point really.
It's like how many lbs am I hitting you with?
73
Jeff
Do you work in an industry (or know of an industry or situation) that expresses swr as a ratio like "3:2" or something? In CB and ham radio it is always expressed as "x.x:1" so the experienced operators here know right away that it is in fact a ratio. Seriously though, is the "1" in the ratio not always a given when expressing swr?
............people just like to complain about things, and that entertains others.
Yes I agree. People complaining about something that is actually factually correct can be rather entertaining. LOL Just yanking your chain.
Well to be honest with you I’m not sure. I’m new to the base station stuff and have opened a door into a whole different world. My cb experience has always been mobile either in a personal vehicle or tractor trailer. The radio I set up as my base is a Stryker 655 ( now I wish it was the 955) that was hooked to a Stryker SR-A10 antenna. Worked awesome after a little tuning and you were set.The OP really isn't saying what his goal for his station, primarily local or DX contacts or both?
Local ground wave? Then that antenna needs to get up in the air at least 18ft at a minimum. 36ft would be better if possible.
DX can get away with a lower height because usually you're only going to talk to what you hear anyway.
What about the elevated ground plane kit or ground radials? Also many users of this antenna say you have to choke off the coax line before the feedpoint to keep the coax from radiating?
Just thought I would mention those things for others too point out on this thread who use this antenna.