• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Click here to find out how to win free radios from Retevis!

Ameritron AL80-B blowing fuse on power up

Can you give a make and model number of the tube tester you used to test a 3-500z. Thanks. Now that we are beyond the tube being bad the next step would be to "at least" check the rectifier diodes and see if there is a shorted one. Very easy to do. Then the HV secondary can be easily isolated from the rectifier and then once again see if the fuse blows. If it does then probably a transformer short if not then probably a capacitor.
 
i know it isnt just a faulty fuse. every time i replaced the fuse, it immediately blew it. when i get home from work, i will check those caps. since the tube tested good on the tube tester, im hoping it is those caps. if not, ill be coming to see you with Forrest. Thanks nomad!

Just curious what kind of tube tester you used to check the tube. I don't recall ever seeing one that would allow a 3-500Z to be tested. Usually they are for much smaller tubes. The filament alone requires 15 amps of current. Then again I have not seen every tube tester ever made.
 
Only 3-500Z tube tester I have used was a one tube amplifier with fuse in the HV line in case the tube arced over it would blow the fuse instead of taking out the ps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Kilowatt
You can check for a BAD with a meter. If the filament is open, or if it shows a short from cathode to grid, that's a conclusive test. That tube is bad.

What you CAN'T check with a meter is a good tube. Gotta put operating voltages on it for that.

Even a tube tester has limits. If it says the tube is bad, you should believe it.

If it says the tube is good, this only means it's safe to try in the equipment. If the radio doesn't like that tube, this is the only opinion that matters, whatever a tester might say.

73
Well only partially true. Open filament is the only sure test for a meter and maybe if the tube has a hard G-F short, but most G-F shorts more often than not, won’t show on a meter. This is because most G-F shorts only show up when the filament is heated and migrates ( moves) and touches the grid or vice versa. Nor will a meter pick up a gassy tube that will arc and blow up unprotected parts. You may be lucky to pick up a short with a meter if you affix the meter leads to the tube pins and slowly roll the tube on a flat surface. An analog meter works best.
 
Intermittent G-K shorts are where the "octopus" 2-terminal curve tracer/component tester really pays for itself. Even a brief contact between a loose grid wire and the filament will 'flip' the trace on the 'scope screen.

Probably the most insidious thing to go wrong with a 3-500Z, and way too common. The control grid is a cylindrical "fence" of parallel vertical wires held in place by a wire ring at the top, bottom and middle of the structure. When the spot weld holding one end of a grid wire comes loose from the ring at that end, no problem occurs until heat warps the wire. The loose end will "curl" away from the broken weld spot until it touches the filament, or worse, the anode.

Driving the tube too hard, or loading the output too tightly can push grid current high enough to overheat the grid and break one of the spot welds.

Our routine test before we'll power up a 3-500Z in the customer's equipment is to hook the octopus from one cathode to one grid pin and (gently) slap the tube on the side, turning it right-side up, upside-down and sideways. Any flash of movement on the 'scope screen means that tube will be toxic to the amplifier sooner or later.


73
 
The old octopus to o scope, I remember way back in the early 80s I was a young pup in the navy electronic field, we built octopus to use testing components.
those were the days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tallman
The old octopus to o scope, I remember way back in the early 80s I was a young pup in the navy electronic field, we built octopus to use testing components.
those were the days.
My primary Oscilloscope came with one built in.
3351-1425595604-f3a9046893b9f196eb797651fc8eb8a1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: wavrider
I remember way back in the early 80s I was a young pup in the navy electronic field, we built octopus to use testing components. Those were the days.
I had one employer right after I got out tell me that if I wasn't Navy he would not even bother talking to me to hire for his spot. He said Navy techs are the best. I think I have to agree! But of course I could be a little biased.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBI
http://www.jammarcade.net/simple-component-tester-a-k-a-octopus-curve-tracer/

If I remember correctly the octopus was actually in a Rate training manual for third class Petty Officer..Few years later the Navy was purchasing a signal tracer, octopus in a box with CRT.

Few years after that we were tracing circuit cards,(mapping the circuits) on known good working CCA's ( circuit card assemblies) saving them to floppy disk ( showing my age here) and calling them gold disks.
Then we could compare the gold disk to a suspected bad CCA and trouble shoot using the circuit tracer.

Sort of taking the TECH out of technician and using computers to compare results.
This system was called acronym,,,ATS or Automated Test system, big huge Texas instrument main frame.

The 2M microminature repair techs ( interpret as solder techs) said the new system was just throwing parts at the problem and the technicians forgot how to trouble shoot, were only changing the components the computer program suggested and not verifying the componenet was actually bad.
 
I had a Marine on board my ship that was always giving me hell about being a Swabby.
He had a purple heart that was awarded during one tour in Viet Nam.
I asked him when he was injured and they called for a medic, who showed up?
A Navy Corpsman is who showed up, a swabby!
End of harassment.
This was my ship. AD-36 Destroyer tender. Perfect ship for learning everything about everything. We repaired everything that communicated or radiated.
th
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wavrider
We had the marines on aircraft carriers and security when I first entered the service.
Called them Mardet, Marine Detachment.
Sea going bell hops was our nicknames for them.
Great bunch of guys.
We snuck into their berthing compartment and stole their chrome floor buffer.
Hung it from the overhead pipes on the mess decks.
Those jar heads were one pissed off bunch about that.
 
The War Cry of the Coast Guard was, "Let's go to the beach!"
This is a little jab at one of my relatives. He was moaning and carrying on about how tough the commute home was every night. Poor baby!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wavrider
I cruised on aircraft carriers.
USS John C, Stennis, USS Eisenhower. USS John F Kennedy. USS Saratoga
I know what you mean by repairing everything. We had an AIMD similar to the black shoes SIMA.
AIMD afloat and we repaired all the small boys and tin can comm equipment or radar while forward deployed.

Got my first introduction to HF data link.Got hooked on BIG HF amps at an early age.
Those ET's and RM's got some fun stuff in the communications room.
And a lot of tubes laying around , pulls from PM schedules.:):)
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.