Man you guys almost have me in tears! Definitely bringing back old memories.
The Taylor GLR4 I had in '75 was a wet noodle in the wind, small diameter 6061-T6 is very flexi - but always seems to come back to straight, but it was quite the performer.
Beat the HELL out of my Astroplane.
A while back Marconi posted several patterns, including one for a .64, and these were, I believe, in free space.
I recall the .64 seemed to have a slight edge over the .625 at ~8°-10° and a lot more over both the .625 & the Vector, above ~20°-25° up to around 45°.
The .64 seems to fill-in better where the .625 & Vector designs dip, at medium take-off angles of radiation, while still maintaining a level of gain at the lower TOA somewhere between the 5/8 and the Vector.
Very interesting about the .58 there The DB. At what elevations above ground did you see the highest gain increase over the .625?
...and when you say linearly loaded, have you a pic to share? Anything like the Hy-gain P500 matching network?
The Taylor GLR4 I had in '75 was a wet noodle in the wind, small diameter 6061-T6 is very flexi - but always seems to come back to straight, but it was quite the performer.
Beat the HELL out of my Astroplane.
A while back Marconi posted several patterns, including one for a .64, and these were, I believe, in free space.
I recall the .64 seemed to have a slight edge over the .625 at ~8°-10° and a lot more over both the .625 & the Vector, above ~20°-25° up to around 45°.
The .64 seems to fill-in better where the .625 & Vector designs dip, at medium take-off angles of radiation, while still maintaining a level of gain at the lower TOA somewhere between the 5/8 and the Vector.
Very interesting about the .58 there The DB. At what elevations above ground did you see the highest gain increase over the .625?
...and when you say linearly loaded, have you a pic to share? Anything like the Hy-gain P500 matching network?