We must be VERY clear here. What I have said is correct, but I am NOT talking about Menu items "CH-11 FMRSSI" or "CH-18 AMRSSI" that you used, at all. They are different settings and are not the RX settings we have been focusing on. (The procedure you mentioned for the TX side "CH-11 FMRSSI" or "CH-18 AMRSSI" is correct, but the two methods obviously can not mix!)
My post is referencing the RX RSSI settings from menu item "CH-40" through to "CH-51" (inclusive of the "ULRS9" setting mentioned in my post).
Sorry that you lost your Tiny SA, it's easily done. This is another reminder to everyone that if they don't have all the info on all the settings, it's best to keep out of this menu because even those with the tools and good technical knowledge can be caught out. The service menu can be an expensive place to play.
73
LOL Pez.
A lot of things have been talked about in this thread. Specifically, before my #76 post we were talking about using a SINAD meter to test the radios RX sensitivity.
In post #76, I was specifically talking about calibrating (CH-11) FMRSSI and (CH-18) AMRSSI.
You quoted my #76 post in your #77 post. If you want to say that isn't what you were talking about, then why did you quote it? But,
I can see where you might of thought I was referring to ch40~ch52.
Just so you know, I would never use "FMRSSI" or "AMRSSI" to refer to ch40~ch52 settings.
Also, if you are saying this is the way to "calibrate" ch40~ch52 settings
"
Setting the RSSI values involves generating an accurate known signal level, and then pressing PTT. This stores the new RSSI value. (eg, Select ULRS9 and generate -73dBm. Press PTT. The new S9 value will update and be saved."
It is not correct.
Correct = After pressing and holding PTT, you turn the channel/freq. knob until the radio's S meter reads the correct S reading for the signal level injected (in this case -73 dBm for S9), then unkey.
You can see Scott from Scott's radios doing this in several of his youtube videos for customers when he is checking S9. You can see that he adjusts the S meter reading so it reads on exactly S9 on the radios S meter. He doesn't do that by simply pressing PTT.
Even though the meter can be calibrated in 6 points (S1, S3, S5, S7, S9, and S9+60), Scott only calibrates for S9.
How do I know that? Because several people here with SN 580490, 580491, and SN 580493 radios have complained about the "appearance" of a high noise floor. One of Scott's video shows him tuning up SN 580494 and calibrating for S9. We know he bought a batch of Q5N2's from Qixiang/Anytone and quite a few members here bought their Q5N2's from Scott.
Its all good. That's how we learn.