I'm sorry to have to give you such news, and to hear that you yourself could not find a way.
I was hoping somehow someone would provide some guidance for an otherwise good radio - just manufactured with issues that they learned from, yes, but did not bother to support the platform they learned from with some type of upgradable effort - even a kit or any form of communication (SIC) to help eliminate or alleviate this condition
(* as the laughter and guffawing in the Manufacturers Boardroom settles down to general coughing and mumbles...*)
The FCC is totally useless in matters like this.
Now you know why I do get frustrated at the way Type-Acceptance and Accountability have disappeared as of late - too many foreign manufacturers have found loopholes in such matters to nearly put an end to the Radio Manufacturing business that originally the USA helped to create the demand and generate such a market.
In doing so, have now placed our dependence on newer technology, now more foreign to us than Radio itself - from places that once were not considered as viable sources.
We only have ourselves to blame.
To Add:
This "error" - is schematically and physically present in their radio...
I've amended this post to show a rather blatant error in Hi-Pass to Low-Pass configurations...using their data...
Their Band pass Filter uses RESITIVE elements as well as even fewer elements.
Uses similar Common Emitter but note the uses of the Emitter Resistor values
R values (At Emitter) for AT-5555 is 10 ohm 472 bypass cap
R Values (At Emitter) for CB typical is 22 ohms of same 472 Bypass Cap
Gain results are different - Base Biasing also allows AT-5555 for much more gain.
In the typical CB - uses 3 stages, 1 pre Driver stage
The AT-555 uses 3 combined.
I'll let you explore and expose the rest.