Can't avoid how much this sounds like the same debate around eliminating the code requirement, arguments, objections and all. Hasn't been quite long enough to forget.
Yet.
Not to criticize, just observe. Consider for a moment that more activity on our frequencies is better than less activity.
If we populate the bands in an active way that can be measured, it serves to justify the gazillions of dollars' worth of spectrum we enjoy for free. "See, we're really USING it!"
I would worry less about manufacturer's 'bribing' the ARRL to expand operating privileges and worry more about who will bribe the FCC to yank our spectrum forever. With few exceptions, when a chunk of it gets repurposed for the "greater good" we never get it back.
73
Yet.
Not to criticize, just observe. Consider for a moment that more activity on our frequencies is better than less activity.
If we populate the bands in an active way that can be measured, it serves to justify the gazillions of dollars' worth of spectrum we enjoy for free. "See, we're really USING it!"
I would worry less about manufacturer's 'bribing' the ARRL to expand operating privileges and worry more about who will bribe the FCC to yank our spectrum forever. With few exceptions, when a chunk of it gets repurposed for the "greater good" we never get it back.
73