So in short term would you say that it performs better then the vector 4000 or SP500 as far as RX and Tx goes? The wattage part is my only concern but again ive never had to run more then 300 watts on SSb to do what I need it to do!! My BIGGEST thing im looking at is a antenna that has the lowest loss at the feed point and highest gain out and if icing the cake was being able to hold 2k watts that would be nice also, but can live without that because my beams will be up sooner or later and set up for Am Broadcasting
The models in my link below don't show the GM is better in gain or angle over real Earth, but I explained other features the GM has that I think are superior without doubt. My real world experience with several other antennas show the GM is nothing special in performance either, but the other features it has impress me. Right now I have it up, and 36' away I have one of my original StarDusters up about 6' short of being as tall to the tip. I see very little difference in gain most of the time, but the SD'r is typically quieter by a good bit...in my setup here. That might change however, it I were to switch the mounts.
Here is a link to my TOA thread for CB antennas 211. I have listed some my CB models in their order of gain over Real Earth.
If you're looking for models that guarantee perfection in results, then don't consider my models, listen to what the antenna manufactures claim and go by that. Then maybe you can give me all the nitty-gritty detailed dimensions, and I can try and model the antenna. Then we can compare, and see if the model pans out suggesting what your real world experience and testing produces.
I just model em' and try and get all the dimensions correct. I don't bother with all the Eznec bells and whistles. All the sooth-sayers complain, but my models are none-the-less not much if any different than you'll see from just about every Internet source I've ever seen...excepting for the fact that I'm willing and can provide more info...if you understand modeling somewhat.
Thanks for the comments 211.
http://www.worldwidedx.com/cb-antennas/158801-take-off-patterns-cb-antennas-we-use.html
Modeling is hard enough work just trying to get the dimensions right. Nobody has the time or the patience to make a model produce results that are totally unrealistic on purpose...or so I hope. Of course accidents and errors do happen.
What kind of antenna are you looking for?
In my personal opinion all of my CB antennas produce very close to the same results...if I get the maximum current lobes at the same height to the center. The list above has, for the most part, all antennas at the same 32' foot level. I detailed this in my first post in the thread above and this is just my opinion. I leave things to you guy's to deal with...in all the facts and theories regarding antennas.
Last edited: