your tape measure picture looked like 15 1/4 and 15 3/4 inches in length plus about one inch for the shorter angle diagonally bend and maybe 1 1/2 inches for the longer one at the other end. it looks like about a 3 1/2 inch long curve but its more than half a circle so i figured the curve as 70% a 3 1/2 inch circlke and got 11 inches times 70% and got 8 inches minus the 3 1/2 inches it measures strait across which is already counted in the 15 1/4inches. then i added 1inch for the 90 degree fold at the top plus 3/4 inch on each end for the circles for connecting and when you add it all up i get 41 inches but the circles are only maybe 1/2 inch so thats why i thought 40 inches total looks about right to me and oo7 sounded like he had one right there to measure
NB, you're probably right, you did say 40" straightened out. When I started modeling the SP 500 to included the matcher I noticed that I had read the red numbers on the tape in error.
I think the wires for my model of the matcher all added up to about 40" as it tuns out, but I don't have a loop at the radials, mine is square and I just guessed as some of the smaller lengths, so that will make some difference in the overall length I should get.
Due to the limitations in the way Eznec allows us to connect two wires, I have not figured out yet how to connect the ground wire to the ground (wire #25 in the image), and using accurate dimensions. The ground wire is there, but it is the wrong size and in the wrong place, so my matcher is not working well yet. This is why exact dimensions are so necessary if you want to model. I tried to use the same lengths for the shorter angled areas just as you describe above, 1" and 1.5", but with no curve. So, I'll be a bit short here in the overall as well.
VA3ES said he was going to get the details for the matchers on both an old and a new, and maybe for the whole antenna too. That will help. NB, you said 007 may have the dimensions I wanted too, would you ask him?
View attachment SP 500 matcher.pdf
Someone commented about the matcher's changing when HyGain went to 40 channels, and IMO that would probably make some sense. I just don't think these non-tunable coils are that broad banded as to the tap point, so they could look similar and still have some small dimensional differences over the years. I can't explain why the old to new would necessarily fit this scenario, but I believe it could and it also makes sense.