I pretty much settled on the Ranger SRA-158 after fiddling with just about every power mic I could find. It's not a power mic, but plenty clean and clear.
73,
Brett
But they use cheap switches and brittle cords.
I pretty much settled on the Ranger SRA-158 after fiddling with just about every power mic I could find. It's not a power mic, but plenty clean and clear.
73,
Brett
I have not had a single problem with the three that I have... but they are probably 7 years old now. Not sure about the new ones?But they use cheap switches and brittle cords.
575 if mobile or Astatic 1104c if base.A general answer is Astatic 575-M6
That is not a power mic and he asked about a power mic. Not that I think he should get a power mic but that is what he asked for. No one makes a really good durable great sounding power mic today at any price point for CB. I do not consider the Palomar SL41 a power mic since it does not really have an amplifier stage in it as far as I am aware. It is an electret condenser mic with a powered fet inside of it so I can see how some would consider it a power mic. The fact that a single triple "AAA" battery is designed to last a year in it though so that should tell you how little "amplification" is going on. My first power mic needed a 7V Mercury battery and you did not get a year out of one and the old D104M6B with 9V battery also did not get a year out of one!I pretty much settled on the Ranger SRA-158 after fiddling with just about every power mic I could find. It's not a power mic, but plenty clean and clear.
73,
Brett
I pretty much settled on the Ranger SRA-158 after fiddling with just about every power mic I could find. It's not a power mic, but plenty clean and clear.
73,
Brett
yes it is the old style 148 made in 2003...
great audioWell...did you get that Mike hooked up to that radio? What do you think of it? Just curious.
great audio