• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • The Retevis Holidays giveaway winner has been selected! Check Here to see who won!

best radio for receive on ssb

the reason the htx-100 has a the narrower i.f. filter (3khz) is because it has no a.m. the 2510 has a 5khz filter because it has a.m. if you pass a 6khz wide a.m. signal through a 3khz filter, it is going to sound like crap. uniden could have used separate ssb and a.m. chains with filters in each chain (3khz for ssb and 5-6khz for a.m.), but then they would have to pass this cost on to the consumer.

this is exactly what cobra/uniden did with the 148gtl (used individual fitlers for a.m. and ssb). and to go a step further, they used a 6 pole crystal filter in the ssb chain which narrowed the passband down to about 2.1-2.4khz.

even the newer uniden clones (rci, galaxy, etc) use a separate filter for ssb that is about 2.5-3khz wide. this is about the same bandwidth as for the htx-100.

a radio being multi-banded has nothing to do with its selectivity. it is mainly in the design of the i.f. circuits as demonstrated by the htx100 and 2510 comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freecell
freecell said:
one more time C2, Uniden only presents one.

which incarnation of the 148 was that?

I see, very informative...the Y-axis is the output voltage of the AGC rectifier. Kind of what you would expect I guess.

The 148 was an 89 Filapina, and I think there is a sensitivity specification published by Uniden, something to the effect of 0.15 uV for 20 dB SINAD or S+N/N, whatever it is. But I still like to revert to actual performance figures.

Which are relavant in this case, no?
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.