• You can now help support WorldwideDX when you shop on Amazon at no additional cost to you! Simply follow this Shop on Amazon link first and a portion of any purchase is sent to WorldwideDX to help with site costs.
  • Retevis is giving away Radios for the New Year and Every Member is Eligible. Click Here to see the details!

beware......im trying to think again !!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BOOTY MONSTER
  • Start date Start date
Marconi said:
To be more specific MC, 'Doc do you figure #2 is shorter that #1 when you added 2" of 1" material to #2?

I understand what you are getting at, but some might read your post in detail and miss the real point of why element diameter and total surface mass matters. You were going along pretty good there for a bit, then the thingy bit you in the *7%$.
2 inches of 1" material? Do you mean 2 feet of 1" material like I said?

Nothing bit me in the ass. I explained it perfectly. With the larger diameter first section, the physical size of the antenna will be shorter than the first. Its as easy as that!
 
I did go back an re-read 'Doc's post and I did miss-read his numbers. Sorry 'Doc!
 

dxChat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.