The overall diameter of the current AR10 is 13". The older ones were smaller. About 10" diameter.
Thanks, Homer. Based on the current manual that Gary posted above...I estimated the ring diameter was maybe 14" in diameter with each bracket about 7" inches long. See note with such a 7" inch dimension measuring between 90* and 180* degree points on the ring.
I wonder why CC even added this measurement...the ring is not adjustable.
The lengths for the vertical start at the top of the insulator, not the overall antenna length.
I agree Homer, but from here on I'm just guessing. There are 5 sections to the exposed vertical radiator including the base assembly which probably comes preassembled and shows no dimensions.
With 4 inches of overlap per tubes BB,CC,DD = 132" inches. Assuming AA from the isolator up is 48" inches exposed, I get 180" inches from the insulator to the top of DD. This allows for EE = 12" inches of exposure to equal 192" inches overall for the mid-band frequency which I choose to model. If successful I would then scale the 10 meter to 27.205 MHz.
The base assembly could also be 48" inches with about 12" inches down inside the base mount which would make it 36" inches exposed. This would make the tip EE = 24 inches exposed instead of 12" inches as I noted above.
There are other possible combinations here that would matter somewhat if modeled to specs, which I doubt are easily available.
The stub is 16-5/8" long.
I see that dimension in the manual, but I see no details of its characteristics. I assume it is an inductor, but the type of coax might make a difference. I also assume it is a closed-end loop.
1.5" is right for the space in between the ends of the ring.
I will use this dimension for now.
I think the bottom is about eight inches, too. I'll measure it.
My ideas above consider the mounting bracket to be 12" or more. I see the mast going up inside this bracket that might be 1.25" inches in diameter, but I'm not sure how the tip is isolated from the radiator that is also inside. There are some words in the manual about this setup inside, but I do not have this point clear in my mind regarding how to model. Best guess is to just use a space between the mast and the antenna PERIOD. This is a similar problem I have with modeling the Maco V-58 and my Wolf 50_11M knockoff of the Ringo. I don't think I can physically model an object inside of another object...like a capacitor.
You guys don't have to go to any extra trouble on my account, this design seems difficult at best...even if I had the antenna here on my workbench. There are a lot of little dimensions that might be necessary to get this physical matching setup to work like the real antenna...if that is even possible. I've tried it before and was not successful with the Maco V-58 and my Wolf 50_11M, and Cushcraft never makes thing easy.
I will add however, that my Wolf knockoff of the Ringo never showed a good match and worked best with 1.70 SWR using SSB at the top or 11 meters. Before I broke on me I repeatedly got very good unsolisited reports locally on this antenna and during the short time I worked it I always seem to show RX signals as good or a bit better than some of my other CB antennas. I never worked it in any comparison testing I've looked back on, but I was impressed with how it worked.